Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
10th July 2007, 08:06 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 55
|
BD+ Unbreakable for 10 Years says Richard Doherty of Envisioneering Group
In the latest issue of HMM Richard Doherty a Media analyist with Envisioneering Group says " BD +, Unlike AACS, Which suffered a partial Hack Last Year, Won't likely be breached for 10 years." Doherty said "and if so The damage would effect one film and one player."
He also said BD + Offers 4 time the safeguards on top of aacs against piracy. All Blu-Ray Players are equipped with BD +. example of BD+: Doherty cited Sony theoretically releasing Spiderman 3 on Blu-Ray and allowing consumers to download the film to an Ipod or streaming copy on a home network. Should a breach occur in digital or physical form, Dohert said BD+ would let Sony circumvent the damage more quickly compared to AACS because the hacked movie could only be played on a particular Sony Player. Original article is available at: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=871371 Amazing, talk about baiting hackers |
10th July 2007, 08:30 | #2 | Link |
Straight to video
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 637
|
Yeah... have you googled this company? Previous "interviews" and "reports" on Sony by the folks at Envisioneering Group show exactly what side their bread is buttered on... they're obviously a PR firm owned or hired by Sony to make independent-sounding, upbeat pronouncements about the glorious Sony product line.
|
10th July 2007, 21:44 | #5 | Link |
binary member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: jmp eip
Posts: 65
|
...yes, and my grandma got wheels.
«if u can play it, u can copy it.» - ancient chinese proverb. -- nullstuff
__________________
"there's a crack; a crack in everything: it's how the light gets in" - l/cohen |
10th July 2007, 23:07 | #6 | Link |
Dragon Slayer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Paradise - MD Eastern Shore
Posts: 126
|
Hmm, Let me see, been a member for 5 years and has only made 3 posts; tell me that this could not be a fox watching the hen house?
__________________
Dragons are alive and well! Foxconn P45A-S/Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHZ/Artic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro/16GB OCZ2VU80016GQ DDR2 800MHZ/Radeon HD 3850 512MB GDDR3 PCIe Crossfire x2 |
11th July 2007, 03:55 | #7 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 383
|
What they said is completely wrong.
Once bd+ is cracked, the same cracking method can be used by everyone to decrypt their discs, the only thing we cant do is share the key because its different for each disc. Anyway it only takes one person to decrypt the disc and upload it to bittorrent |
11th July 2007, 07:13 | #9 | Link |
Resident DRM Hater
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: International waters
Posts: 242
|
That's not ideal, though, for two reasons:
1) AFAIK, downloading/copying someone else's backup is illegal. Only making your own is legal. 2) Finding 50GB BD ISOs on P2P? More like poorly-encoded low-resolution MKVs/OGMs with logos slapped all over them. If the key is going to be different for each disc then I forsee it being a cat-and-mouse game. Hackers find a way to read the key from the player just as they do with AACS. They write a program that automates the process so the average user can get their key and make a copy. The player manufacturers patch it. Lather, rinse, repeat.
__________________
Because Moogles pwn. |
12th July 2007, 18:51 | #11 | Link |
binary member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: jmp eip
Posts: 65
|
__________________
"there's a crack; a crack in everything: it's how the light gets in" - l/cohen |
18th July 2007, 22:00 | #13 | Link |
I dont care so should you
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In hell next to the boiling pit of Lava...
Posts: 989
|
Oh my god that's so funny I forgot to laugh. Is this guy serious frigging clown...
My aching arse ten years... What a bold load of crap! One maybe two years at tops... And that includes time to reverse engineer and make a successfully running app that has had at leased two reversions and a few running on different platforms... |
28th July 2007, 23:51 | #17 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Denise Richard's Apartment
Posts: 135
|
Doesn't matter
No matter what protection they put on it, at SOME POINT it has to be in a format that your eyes can see. At that point, it is NOT encrypted. Therefore, the bits and bytes can be copied.
BD+ will accomplish its purpose by making it inconvenient to copy movies, thus stopping the average Joe. And yes, all it takes is ONE seed, and the whole world can download. |
29th July 2007, 00:05 | #18 | Link | |
Freevo Developer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
10 years is rather naive, IMHO, but so is a month. BD+ is intrinsically different from what we've seen, and it will take time to grok it, which includes developing the tactics and tools to prod it. My intuitive guess is between 1-2 years, but not inside the year following the first BD+ enabled disk. And I'd be delighted to be wrong. |
|
29th July 2007, 08:56 | #19 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
I don't understand why you think BD+ will take longer just because it is 'different'?! ACCS was different when people started on it and it took two months. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|