Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
23rd March 2012, 14:34 | #2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 957
|
Various patches. I'm sure the patches used are listed next to downloads.
__________________
x264 log explained || x264 deblocking how-to preset -> tune -> user set options -> fast first pass -> profile -> level Doom10 - Of course it's better, it's one more. |
23rd March 2012, 17:22 | #3 | Link |
zj262144
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 105
|
for kMod, see The list "Used patches for builds"
for tMod, see 06_taro's Blog P.S. JEEB also compiling Mod ver and it's better say "vanilla" than "official" for x264's builds
__________________
MPC-HC 1.7.8 / LAV Filters 0.64+ (tMod) / XySubFilter 3.1.0.705 / madVR 0.87.14 Direct264 Mod (src & win32 builds): code.google.com/p/direct264umod (maybe outdated) |
23rd January 2015, 16:16 | #4 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 115
|
I know it's old thread but...
Who knows why Clear Builds (claimed so) on Komisar's site are 8-10MB size while on videolan's site they are just 1-3MB? I just don't get what exe files to put in Xvid4PSP 5 directory as update. |
23rd January 2015, 17:45 | #5 | Link | |
Compression mode: Lousy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 72
|
Quote:
|
|
24th January 2015, 12:46 | #6 | Link | |||
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Posts: 235
|
Quote:
64-bit: Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by komisar; 24th January 2015 at 12:48. |
|||
25th January 2015, 13:31 | #7 | Link | ||
Compression mode: Lousy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 72
|
Quote:
Quote:
Code:
upx -d x264-r2491-24e4fed.exe Ultimate Packer for eXecutables Copyright (C) 1996 - 2013 UPX 3.09w Markus Oberhumer, Laszlo Molnar & John Reiser Feb 18th 2013 File size Ratio Format Name -------------------- ------ ----------- ----------- 8667136 <- 4033024 46.53% win32/pe x264-r2491-24e4fed.exe Unpacked 1 file. |
||
25th January 2015, 14:13 | #8 | Link |
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 5,034
|
I can't understand why people still do that. It may have been useful when hard drives were smaller than 1GB but nowadays it just is ridiculous, not to mention a potential bug source and the cause of several virus scanners going nuts.
|
25th January 2015, 21:46 | #9 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4,770
|
Perhaps the more interesting question is "what is each build optimized for/what are its goals?"
For my personal stuff I tend to use kMod since it's got all kinds of other useful libraries compiled into it, and probably inertia. I don't know what other ones might have to offer these days. Stuff compiled in Intel's ICC for better performance versus GCC used to be a thing, but I not heard much about that lately. Do folks have other recommendations based on features/performance/reliability/correctness? |
12th February 2023, 12:35 | #10 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 48
|
Can someone smarter than I break down the actual differences between the builds: kMod?, tMod?, LigH and videolan's builds?, jpsdr's build? I see mention of the patches, but what are they actually adding? Are some builds missing certain useful/important patches? New commands, like the aq-mode 4/5 in the custom x265 builds? Are they just further optimized for newer compilers and architectures? Or maybe a little of both? Patch merges are bit beyond my reading comprehension
LigH, VideoLAN, and jdspr's x264s still seem to be updated regularly and I'm just wondering which one I should be using, if there's even a feature difference, or perhaps there's even another build I've missed (those 3 are just the ones in the x264 thread OP). Since this thread still comes up when Google searching for info on them, I figured I may as well just bump it for others like me |
|
|