Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > (HD) DVD, Blu-ray & (S)VCD > (HD) DVD & Blu-ray authoring

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 3rd September 2013, 20:49   #41  |  Link
jediknight
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 48
I think Network Optix take over TSMuxer project or smartlabs = network optix. . Lets wait explanation from @physic.
jediknight is offline  
Old 3rd September 2013, 22:28   #42  |  Link
physic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 173
Physic is my new nickname last several years (I know and like science e.t.c). My real name is Roman actually. And I forget email and password at this forum.

I got Blu-ray specs several hours ago. So, I am going to start with 3D bluray on output (and 3D subtiels as well). It is going to take several days. So, you can add feature requests, I'll arrange it. But I'll start a little bit latter with bugs and features.

Current target - 3D.
physic is offline  
Old 3rd September 2013, 22:36   #43  |  Link
A.Fenderson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by physic View Post
Physic is my new nickname last several years (I know and like science e.t.c). My real name is Roman actually. And I forget email and password at this forum.

I got Blu-ray specs several hours ago. So, I am going to start with 3D bluray on output (and 3D subtiels as well). It is going to take several days. So, you can add feature requests, I'll arrange it. But I'll start a little bit latter with bugs and features.

Current target - 3D.
What's the best way to donate towards continued tsMuxeR development?
A.Fenderson is offline  
Old 3rd September 2013, 22:38   #44  |  Link
physic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 173
tsMuxeR is started as my own project. But then I shared rights with SmartLabs (all source code is written by me in anyway). Smartlabs and I both have full rights to tsMuxeR source.
Network Optix - startup company where I working now. I want to improve Network Optix brand awareness.
physic is offline  
Old 3rd September 2013, 22:39   #45  |  Link
HWK
Registered User
 
HWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
physic, to create ssif I think you will need add option which restrict output to iso. On a side note I own mvc encoder if you need help or think I can help let me know.

Last edited by HWK; 3rd September 2013 at 22:50. Reason: remove unwanted data
HWK is offline  
Old 3rd September 2013, 22:40   #46  |  Link
physic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 173
Quote:
What's the best way to donate towards continued tsMuxeR development?
Just as many queries, I'll return donate tab soon. :-)
physic is offline  
Old 3rd September 2013, 22:49   #47  |  Link
physic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 173
By the way: if anybody have a couple of fast SSD drives: please check tsMuxeR processing speed in some general scenario (M2TS remuxin for example), I meain source and target files should be on a different SSD drive to improve speed.
- Is version 1.11.x have better speed than 1.10.x?
- How big processing speed in Mb/sec?
physic is offline  
Old 3rd September 2013, 22:59   #48  |  Link
filler56789
SuperVirus
 
filler56789's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Antarctic Japan
Posts: 1,351
Many for your new cycle of productivity

And as a side note , please don't forget HEVC, because for the time being, GPAC's mp42ts is the only tool in the kit.
filler56789 is offline  
Old 3rd September 2013, 23:08   #49  |  Link
laserfan
Aging Video Hobbyist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Off the Map
Posts: 2,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by physic View Post
My real name is Roman actually. And I forget email and password at this forum.
Roman, welcome back!!!!

You are a legend, sir. I can't even imagine where we'd all be with our BD fun except for tsMuxeR(oman)!

laserfan is offline  
Old 3rd September 2013, 23:09   #50  |  Link
Reel.Deel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,664
@physic

Glad to hear tsMuxer's development is continuing.
Keep up the good work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by physic View Post
I'll return donate tab soon. :-)
If not to much trouble can you please add the option to donate with PayPal directly.
Reel.Deel is offline  
Old 3rd September 2013, 23:18   #51  |  Link
jediknight
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by physic View Post
By the way: if anybody have a couple of fast SSD drives: please check tsMuxeR processing speed in some general scenario (M2TS remuxin for example), I meain source and target files should be on a different SSD drive to improve speed.
- Is version 1.11.x have better speed than 1.10.x?
- How big processing speed in Mb/sec?
Yes i have 3x SSD Drives.

SSD #1 : OCZ Vector 512 GB -
Sequential Read: 550 MB/s; Sequential Write: 530 MB/s
4k Random Write: 100K IOPS; 4k Random Read: 95K IOPS

SSD #2 OCZ Vertex 3 128 GB

Max Read: up to 550MB/s, Max Write: up to 500 MB/s, 4KB Random Write: I/O Per Second (IOPS): 60,000 IOPS, Seek time: 0.1 ms, Controller: SandForce 2281

SSD #3 OCZ Vertex 3 128 GB

I will do test and will put results here
jediknight is offline  
Old 4th September 2013, 01:20   #52  |  Link
QBhd
QB the Slayer
 
QBhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 697
Demux from 4x500GB Caviar Black RAID0 to 2x60GB Mushkin Chronos RAID0 (via mounted ISO located on a 300GB short stroke):



Remux (to Bluray) from above files on 2x60GB Mushkin Chronos RAID0 to 4x500GB Caviar Black RAID0 (300GB short stroke):



I also checked CPU usage and it was working with nice multi-threading (I have an FX-8350)

Hope this info helps

edit:

I just did a windows cut and paste of the demuxed files and it only transfered at an average of 299 MB/s (doing the math of the bluray remux, tsMuxeR did it at 322 MB/s)... your SW is more efficient than Win 7 x64 explorer!

QB

ps... I have been in love with your SW for a very long time... glad to see development is back underway!
__________________

Last edited by QBhd; 4th September 2013 at 03:13. Reason: More info...
QBhd is offline  
Old 4th September 2013, 01:43   #53  |  Link
jediknight
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by jediknight View Post
Yes i have 3x SSD Drives.

SSD #1 : OCZ Vector 512 GB -
Sequential Read: 550 MB/s; Sequential Write: 530 MB/s
4k Random Write: 100K IOPS; 4k Random Read: 95K IOPS

SSD #2 OCZ Vertex 3 128 GB

Max Read: up to 550MB/s, Max Write: up to 500 MB/s, 4KB Random Write: I/O Per Second (IOPS): 60,000 IOPS, Seek time: 0.1 ms, Controller: SandForce 2281

SSD #3 OCZ Vertex 3 128 GB

I will do test and will put results here
Here is my test results;

Source: OCZ Vector 512 GB (non-raid)
Destination: OCZ Vertex 3 128 GB (non-raid)
File Size: 34,3 GB
Type: .m2ts

TsMuxeR 1.10.6


Disk Usage:


TsMuxeR 1.11.6(b)


Disk Usage:


CPU Usage (Intel i7-3970x):



This is my results, hope will help you.

Last edited by jediknight; 4th September 2013 at 01:46.
jediknight is offline  
Old 4th September 2013, 03:30   #54  |  Link
QBhd
QB the Slayer
 
QBhd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 697
Update:

I forgot to do a comparison to Version 1.10.6... so I ran the exact same file as above in the exact same way with Version 1.10.6... here are the results:

Demuxing time: 3 min 2 sec
Muxing time: 1 min 30 sec

Also the original .m2ts from the BluRay ISO was 22.7 GB (24,381,474,816 bytes).

So as you can see 1.11.6(b) is substantially faster and more multi-threaded as well... the demux is 22.5% faster and the remux is 20% faster

EDIT:

Ran the 1.11.6(b) test again but from the SSD's to the HDD's on the demux and here is that result:

Demuxing time: 1 min 17 sec

Seems that I am limited by the speed of the 4x500GB Caviar Blacks... I took a screenie of CPU usage for this one:




QB
__________________

Last edited by QBhd; 4th September 2013 at 03:47.
QBhd is offline  
Old 4th September 2013, 10:35   #55  |  Link
Selur
Registered User
 
Selur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,259
just saw this thread and didn't have time to do any testing,..
Here's a list of a bunch of bugs that the old version had and which should be fixed:
  • handling of Unicode file and folder names (old version only accepted ascii)
  • allow to specific base output file names (the concatenation of the m2ts file names 00001+00003+.... can get too long > 255)
  • on mac tsMuxeR always crashes if AppleMyungjo.ttf and/or Gungseouche.ttf are present in /Library/Fonts
  • extract dts express(dts-es) streams (old version couldn't)
  • creation of AVCHD compatible structure like SeeMoreDigital mentioned above
__________________
Hybrid here in the forum, homepage
Selur is offline  
Old 4th September 2013, 13:28   #56  |  Link
physic
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 173
QBhd
Thank you! So, version 1.11 is faster as I expected, but still limited by CPU in muxing operation. I think after correct optimization speed about 500 Mb/sec can be achieved in scenario with 2 SSD (as fast as simple file copy). But so high speed required a lot to work to do. It is not high priority task in my list.
physic is offline  
Old 4th September 2013, 13:50   #57  |  Link
Groucho2004
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 5,034
Quote:
Originally Posted by QBhd View Post
your SW is more efficient than Win 7 x64 explorer!
Not to take away from Roman's efforts but this is hardly a benchmark.
Windows Explorer is a bloated piece of garbage (increasingly so as Windows versions advance) with idiotic animated progress dialogs that eat 100 times more CPU cycles than the copying process it is supposed to perform.
__________________
Groucho's Avisynth Stuff
Groucho2004 is offline  
Old 4th September 2013, 17:11   #58  |  Link
HWK
Registered User
 
HWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
I conducted some test as well and from what I can conclude there is certainly decrease in time to create output for blu-ray, avchd or m2ts.

Decrease in time 11.1% to build file in new version. I want to also mention all test took place in ram as such I couldn't show screenshot of resource monitor, since it didn't appear in there.

Source: Ice Age: A mammoth Christmas special (Run time 25 min)

Processor usage was at 1% and clock at 4.00GHZ (Intel i7-3930K)

Last edited by HWK; 4th September 2013 at 20:19. Reason: remove images
HWK is offline  
Old 4th September 2013, 18:27   #59  |  Link
tebasuna51
Moderator
 
tebasuna51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain
Posts: 6,890
@HWK
Thanks for your job testing old and new tsMuxeR versions.
BTW, I don't want attach 10 big (1918x877) jpg files (1795.7 KB) only to show this info:

Code:
Muxing time   1.10.6  1.11.6
------------  ------  ------
AVCHD          9 sec   8 sec
Blu-ray disk   9 sec   8 sec
Demux         12 sec  12 sec
M2TSMuxing     9 sec   8 sec
TSMuxing       8 sec   8 sec
Tell us if there are other relevant info in the images than I don't see.
__________________
BeHappy, AviSynth audio transcoder.

Last edited by tebasuna51; 4th September 2013 at 18:34.
tebasuna51 is offline  
Old 4th September 2013, 20:01   #60  |  Link
HWK
Registered User
 
HWK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
Quote:
Originally Posted by tebasuna51 View Post
@HWK
Thanks for your job testing old and new tsMuxeR versions.
BTW, I don't want attach 10 big (1918x877) jpg files (1795.7 KB) only to show this info:

Code:
Muxing time   1.10.6  1.11.6
------------  ------  ------
AVCHD          9 sec   8 sec
Blu-ray disk   9 sec   8 sec
Demux         12 sec  12 sec
M2TSMuxing     9 sec   8 sec
TSMuxing       8 sec   8 sec
Tell us if there are other relevant info in the images than I don't see.
I can't think of any so far. Know you mention it 10 images are rather on high side.
HWK is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:25.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.