BD Rebuilder Beta - Bug Reports Only

[jdobbs]

@meadrocks

Have you tried multipart sources other than those two? I don't have either of those discs. But I just did another test of a multipart source output to MKV and it worked fine. It was AVC... but I'll try redoing it in HEVC to see if it changes (I can't imagine why it would since that shouldn't affect a PGS stream).

[Edit] Completed the HEVC encode -- no issue with the subtitles. I'll try MP4 output next.

[Edit] Yes, the MP4 worked as well.

[ggtop]

IIRC I have an European version of Watchmen DC. Let me find it and do some testing.

[Edit] Unfortunately it's not DC. It's the 165 min version and it's not multi part.

ggtop

[LowDead]

Originally Posted by LowDead

Bitdefender have nothing to report with BD_Rebuilder v0.61.13

//LD

I may have jumped the gun on this one...

When doing an ordinary bluray encode my Bitdefender acted up on bdrb.exe halfway into the encode claiming it to be ransomware and that it had infected two files. One nvidia file(don't remember wich one) and lastcmd.txt. Bitdefender autorestored them and I had to exclude bdrb.exe to be able to continue.

//LD

[jdobbs]

Originally Posted by LowDead

I may have jumped the gun on this one...

When doing an ordinary bluray encode my Bitdefender acted up on bdrb.exe halfway into the encode claiming it to be ransomware and that it had infected two files. One nvidia file(don't remember wich one) and lastcmd.txt. Bitdefender autorestored them and I had to exclude bdrb.exe to be able to continue.

//LD

I submitted the file to AVAST! and they tested it, verified it, and excluded it from their list. I also submitted it to AVG -- but they haven't responded yet.

BD-RB definitely modifies LASTCMD.TXT -- it always updates it with the last encode command (for debugging). It's silly to think that a text file could be "infected", though. It makes no changes to any NVIDIA files, not sure what that is about.

[LowDead]

Originally Posted by jdobbs

I submitted the file to AVAST! and they tested it, verified it, and excluded it from their list. I also submitted it to AVG -- but they haven't responded yet.

BD-RB definitely modifies LASTCMD.TXT -- it always updates it with the last encode command (for debugging). It's silly to think that a text file could be "infected", though. It makes no changes to any NVIDIA files, not sure what that is about.

yes, super strange... I will see if Bitdefender can verify also.

//LD

[Mike-uk]

malware bytes flagged up version 09( i know were on 13 but i was having a problem creating a bd struture from a mkv import so wanted to see if and earlier version worked) as a threat

Malwarebytes

-Log Details-
Protection Event Date: 31/08/2020
Protection Event Time: 10:32
Log File: e7d454dc-eb6c-11ea-b3eb-0c9d9279b63b.json

-Software Information-
Version: 4.2.0.82
Components Version: 1.0.1025
Update Package Version: 1.0.29253
Licence: Trial

-System Information-
OS: Windows 10 (Build 19041.450)
CPU: x64
File System: NTFS
User: System

-Blocked Malware Details-
File: 1
MachineLearning/Anomalous.100%, C:\Users\xxxx\Desktop\BD_Rebuilder09\BDRB.exe, Quarantined, 0, 392687, 1.0.29253, , shuriken, , 447C0F9C095C02880FE9B16AB91499AD, 4865F0F4278C7D6775CA460B67EB320810F00AA07583541D5B8B2859AD8EB3C4


(end)

[jdobbs]

This is getting crazy. It seems that A/V software is becoming almost as intrusive and harming as the viruses they are meant to protect us from.

[Mike-uk]

and version 10 its flagging up the same, but 13 seems ok so far

[Ch3vr0n]

WOOHOO Just watched the Geforce special event. RTX 3090 CONFIRMED, goodbye GTX 1080, hello 3090. BDRB nvenc is gonna FLYYYYYYYYYYYYY on that thing right out along to say hi to tesla's speedster in space

[SquallMX]

Output video created by BD-RB with nvEnc gets reported as 3840x2176 by TsMuxerGUI and eac3to. Is that right?

command line: "D:\Archivos de Programa\EAC32AC3\eac3to.exe" "D:\Temp\Sherlock Holmes UHD\BDMV\STREAM\00004.m2ts" 4: "D:\Temp\Sherlock Holmes UHD\BDMV\STREAM\00004.m2ts_4eng.ac3" 5: "D:\Temp\Sherlock Holmes UHD\BDMV\STREAM\00004.m2ts_5spa.ac3" 6: "D:\Temp\Sherlock Holmes UHD\BDMV\STREAM\00004.m2ts_6spa.ac3" 7: "D:\Temp\Sherlock Holmes UHD\BDMV\STREAM\00004.m2ts_7jap.ac3" -progressnumbers -log="D:\Archivos de Programa\EAC32AC3\UsEac3To.log"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M2TS, 1 video track, 5 audio tracks, 29 subtitle tracks, 2:08:30, 23.978i
1: Chapters, 30 chapters
2: h265/HEVC, 3840x2176 48i /1.001 (30:17), 10 bits
3: DTS Master Audio, English, 5.1 channels, 16 bits, 48kHz
(core: DTS, 5.1 channels, 1509kbps, 48kHz)
4: AC3, English, 5.1 channels, 448kbps, 48kHz, dialnorm: -27dB, 4671ms
5: AC3, Spanish, 5.1 channels, 448kbps, 48kHz, dialnorm: -27dB, 4671ms
6: AC3, Spanish, 5.1 channels, 448kbps, 48kHz, dialnorm: -27dB, 4671ms
7: AC3, Japanese, 5.1 channels, 448kbps, 48kHz, dialnorm: -27dB, 4671ms
...

[MrVideo]

Originally Posted by Ch3vr0n

WOOHOO Just watched the Geforce special event. RTX 3090 CONFIRMED, goodbye GTX 1080, hello 3090. BDRB nvenc is gonna FLYYYYYYYYYYYYY on that thing right out along to say hi to tesla's speedster in space

At $1.5k and 3 slots, it is outta my range. The 3070 is more in my price range and slot usage and should be just fine with BDRB as well.

But, they do not give OS requirements. If the driver does not work under Win7-64, then I will have to look at something that does.

[LowDead]

Originally Posted by SquallMX

Output video created by BD-RB with nvEnc gets reported as 3840x2176 by TsMuxerGUI and eac3to. Is that right?

Short answer: Yes, it's a hardware thing... Nothing to worry about though.

Longer technical answer: nVidia Developer Forums

//LD

[jdobbs]

Originally Posted by Ch3vr0n

WOOHOO Just watched the Geforce special event. RTX 3090 CONFIRMED, goodbye GTX 1080, hello 3090. BDRB nvenc is gonna FLYYYYYYYYYYYYY on that thing right out along to say hi to tesla's speedster in space

Originally Posted by MrVideo

At $1.5k...

I want to be just like Ch3vr0n when I grow up!

[videoh]

Gonna have to get a PCIe 4 motherboard to take full advantage of it for CUDA filtering.

[MrVideo]

Oh crap, a PCIe v4 MB?

[videoh]

Originally Posted by MrVideo

Oh crap, a PCIe v4 MB?

Only if you want the doubled bandwidth.

[gonca]

Originally Posted by MrVideo

Oh crap, a PCIe v4 MB?

And that means an AMD cpu, for the Intel fans

[Mike-uk]

ddr5 and pcie 5 in 2021 for intel, looks like intel are making a good decision to almost skip pcie 4 since it was serverly delayed and jump straight to 5 in 2021

[MrVideo]

Originally Posted by gonca

And that means an AMD cpu, for the Intel fans

I only do AMD. Intel only shows up in the laptops.

[Ch3vr0n]

Actually intel just anounced the 11th gen mobile CPU's. Native pcie gen 4 support, "more in 2021" and by more they probably mean 11th gen desktop CPU's. current announced cpu models won't support DDR5, but future ones will.