Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
18th May 2008, 06:26 | #2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NTSC R1
Posts: 2,046
|
Please explain your exact scenario and why you are trying to do this. Why would you want to disable the worker threads? How many workers do you have? I don't understand your question completely.
__________________
|
18th May 2008, 07:27 | #3 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 303
|
Quote:
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...er#post1050201 I'm assuming you only want one worker to be running, I do, two or more instances of dgindex running concurrently takes 3 or 4 times longer(if not more) to process than if they run one after the other or at least that's been my experience, same thing with muxing. |
|
18th May 2008, 10:39 | #4 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
|
@unskinny - like rebkell said, there comes of point of diminishing returns on too many processes running simultaneously. I think HDD usage is the bottle neck. I'd like to have just one work thread since x264 does a great job using all four of my quad's cores by itself.
@rebkell - thanks, this is exactly what I wanted! |
|
|