Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
3rd May 2015, 10:49 | #1101 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: On thin ice
Posts: 6,837
|
@jones1913
It was also reported in the StaxRip thread that AviSynth+ x64 with QTGMC isn't stable using MT, a workaround is using a single thread and run 2 encoding instances to saturate the CPU. We have to wait until ultim or another developer investigates it. |
3rd May 2015, 15:09 | #1102 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,666
|
Quote:
------- In the hopes of having a stable 64-bit AviSynth+ I started a list of all known 64-bit plugins. I still have a bunch of filters to add, some of you may be surprised of how many 64-bit plugins there actually are. Anyways please test and report back! http://avisynth.nl/index.php/AviSynt...2B_x64_plugins Plugins that do not have a 64-bit version:
|
|
3rd May 2015, 23:58 | #1104 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,666
|
Quote:
|
|
4th May 2015, 17:07 | #1106 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
TComb Last edited by l33tmeatwad; 14th May 2015 at 00:01. Reason: Removed FTurn & added EdgeFixer |
|
10th May 2015, 19:53 | #1110 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: On thin ice
Posts: 6,837
|
Is somebody maintaining mvtools2 x64? I would like to report the following bug:
exception raised at 0x00007FFE75BA18D6 (mvtools2.dll) in StaxRip.exe: 0xC0000005: access violation reading at 0x000000004F3004E8. I can provide a detailed description on how to reproduce the bug. |
10th May 2015, 20:36 | #1111 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,666
|
Which version are you talking about? The old one by Joshy D or the latest one v2.6.0.5? Regardless is bad news anyways, Joshy D is no longer around and for the other one I'm not sure who the author is. I stumbled across these builds over at 2ch. Ultim told me the authors name might be 'Shion' but he couldn't confirm it. Maybe someone here knows a bit more. Fortunately the source code is available.
|
12th May 2015, 16:36 | #1116 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 414
|
I've seen you complaining a lot to plugin developers about having issues with StaxRip and MPC-BE and blaming the plugins for the fault. I wanted to ask, are you using AviSynth+ (x86 and x64) for all your tests? Keep in mind that the latests builds have been buggier than the official AviSynth builds currently and those problems probably carry over into the x64 builds as well. The cause of these problems may not be entirely the plugins themselves, could you provide more details as to your setup, including what version of AviSynth or AviSynth+ you are using as well as other applications you have tested? Do you have any crash log information?
|
12th May 2015, 17:32 | #1117 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: On thin ice
Posts: 6,837
|
Requirements to reproduce the access violation are:
Win8 x64 or Win10 x64 AviSynth+ x64 mvtools2 x64 StaxRip x64 or MPC-BE x64 Many x64 problems didn't surface on Win7 and VirtualDub and that's what made it difficult for everybody. Last edited by stax76; 12th May 2015 at 17:50. |
12th May 2015, 19:37 | #1119 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: On thin ice
Posts: 6,837
|
It makes much sense trying different things in order to narrow a problem if you have no real idea what's happening.
In this case tons of things are already known: many problems appear only on Win8/Win10 many problems appear only in certain applications like StaxRip x64 and MPC-BE x64 it's also known how to reproduce the problem: Win8 x64 or Win10 x64 AviSynth+ x64 mvtools2 x64 SMDegrain StaxRip x64 or MPC-BE x64 it's also known that mvtools2 is the currently only plugin known to not work in this environment, about 20 other plugins where successfully tested. it's also known what kind or error happens where: exception raised at 0x00007FFE75BA18D6 (mvtools2.dll) in StaxRip.exe: 0xC0000005: access violation reading at 0x000000004F3004E8. This means the code causing the access violation is mvtools2 and that Visual Studio can show exactly the location in the code. Visual Studio has a option to define at which type of exception is should break in the debugger, that's what I've enabled and that's what has to be enabled when debugging mvtools2. I couldn't setup the built environment because of the Intel compiler and yasm and I don't know ASM so I hope a ASM programmer can investigate it. I don't want to blame or push people, I lost temper and I apologized, take all the time you need to do your ASM magic. I wasn't sure if AviSynth+ x64 is ready when I decided to give up x86, now I know everything basic works and only a few special things are missing so I'm more then happy with the situation. |
12th May 2015, 19:59 | #1120 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 414
|
The reason I ask to test the x86 versions to see if it recreates the problem with AviSynth+ is to just narrow down if it is truly a plugin issue or just how AviSynth+ is using the plugin. There are several instances in this thread where users have reported plugins that work fine with the original branch of AviSynth putting out bad outputs with AviSynth+ because it works a little different based on the changes they made to try and optimize it. Keep in mind that the x64 version of AviSynth+ is actually still in testing and COULD have issues. If you are using plugins that are somewhat far away from the code of their x86 counterparts, I would suggest maybe further testing with the old (and somewhat unstable) unofficial AviSynth 2.5.8 64-bit version release just to give some variety (assuming the plugin is compatible with anything below 2.6, as some new ports are not). Simply knowing the access violation is happening at the plugin does not always mean that the plugin is 100% to blame, and if something needs to be fixed in AviSynth+ to maintain some compatibility then it may be a good thing for those working on it to know.
As for your earlier question, SEt is still active so you could make him aware of the issue at least. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|