Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
4th September 2013, 14:54 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 24
|
Is Aspect Ratio Error very important?
So i have video source that is 640x480, i cut 4 from the left and -12 from the right now is 624x480 and Aspect Ratio Error is -0.28409. I tried to resize to smaller size so the ratio go back to 0 and I found 352x270. So its better to resize to this resolution or leave it with the above aspect ratio error?
|
4th September 2013, 15:04 | #2 | Link |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Cropping doesn't cause any aspect ratio "error", but it may change the aspect ratio.
Your original 640x480 sources was 4:3 (assuming a PAR of 1:1). Now, after the cropping, you got 624x480, which is 4:3.08. There's nothing wrong with that. It's just a slightly different aspect ratio. Now, if you view the result on a 4:3 screen, you may see some tiny "black borders". To avoid that, you could resize the cropped video to exactly 4:3 again. But then you get some error! And since pretty much every screen is 16:9 nowadays, you get huge "black borders" for 4:3 content anyway. Thus, the difference between 4:3 and 4:3.08 shouldn't matter at all on a 16:9 screen.
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 4th September 2013 at 15:09. |
4th September 2013, 15:31 | #4 | Link | |
Software Developer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Last House on Slunk Street
Posts: 13,248
|
Quote:
I don't know what you or MeGUI considers as "error" here. And with respect to what. Maybe you should make that clear first... With cropping you are removing pixels, so it actually becomes easier to encode (at the same bitrate), which should result in better quality (if it makes a difference at all).
__________________
Go to https://standforukraine.com/ to find legitimate Ukrainian Charities 🇺🇦✊ Last edited by LoRd_MuldeR; 4th September 2013 at 15:36. |
|
4th September 2013, 20:25 | #6 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,823
|
Quote:
If you crop without enabling resizing, the remaining video will be encoded "as-is". The aspect ratio of the "remaining" picture won't change. Well the display aspect ratio will, as LoRd_MuldeR explained, but the shape of objects within the remaining video won't be distorted. That's assuming the input video uses square pixels..... What "may" have happened..... I'd assume a 640x480 video would use square pixels and be 4:3, but it's possible the video had a slightly different display aspect ratio than 4:3 (resolution and display aspect ratio aren't always the same). So if you resize it back to 640x480's worth of square pixels, that will distort the picture. When you set up an encode, the script creator should display the aspect ratio of the source video accurately in the InputDAR section. Is it 4:3? If the source video doesn't use square pixels, I'm pretty sure MeGUI will display an aspect error as soon as you open it. In order to fix that you'd either need to enable anamorphic encoding (encoding using the same shape pixels as the original) or without anamorphic encoding enabled, you'd need to use resizing and/or cropping to resize it to square pixels and get the aspect ratio distortion as close to zero as you can. A -0.28409% aspect error is fairly small. Less than 1/3rd of a percent. Even aspect ratio distortions of 2 or 3 percent can be pretty hard to pick unless you can directly compare it to the original video. Last edited by hello_hello; 4th September 2013 at 20:28. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|