Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
![]() |
#2041 | Link | ||
Matroska find' ich toll
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,417
|
Quote:
Quote:
The whole issue comes from the different durations of the frames. A video frame has a duration of 24000/1001 ms (round about 41,708 ms). A .DTS frame has a duration of 32ms (hope I'm right) Let's say our movie has only one video frame: When we use only one Audio frame there are now more than 9 ms playtime of the video without sound. For Blu-ray and maybe all other disc formats: The Audios are always longer than the video. So we have to use 2 Audio frames for our One-Video-Frame-Movie. Now is the Audio duration 64ms and plays 22ms longer then the video. But when the movie uses multiple m2ts files, for each m2ts there is now a bit more Audio as Video. eac3to and DGDemux drops Audio frames when the desynch reach a certain limit. There are also more discussion on Reddit. I have written a lot email with this user and he work on a method where no demuxing is necessary. He means removing Audio data is not good, and he inspired me to look deeper in the BD-specs. And he is absolute right. But to keep the entire data and playback then correctly is currently not possible, but maybe in a near future. I am excited if he can make it to run. When you preserve all the m2ts files in separate mkv files and use Linked-Ordered-Chapters, this could work. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2042 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 79
|
GM M. Just posting to let you know that your sw is “top-shelf.” Feature rich, never crashes, sensible layout, man pages, prior versions, cli…. It’s all there. I even see Reddit posts about mkvtoolnix. Really great product.
Thanks for the new version too. Best…. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2043 | Link |
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,318
|
Thank you very much for your kind words!
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v92.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2044 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 2
|
Hi, all
New to this forum - apologies if this query is in the wrong place. Have been using mkvtoolnix for a number of years now and it has been a fantastic bit of software - many thanks to the author. I am just trying to remux rips of my copies of the Top Gun 4K UHD Blu rays and am confused about how to handle the Dolby Vision data. I am using MakeMKV to copy BDMV folder structures from the discs, and then eac3to to demux to individual streams from the relevant playlists. The demuxing process produces two video streams. My understanding one is the HDR10 "base" layer, and the second (1080p "resolution") stream is the "enhanced" layer track used for DV metadata. My question is, how should this be processed when remuxing into an MKV using mkvtoolnix? I am simply adding both files to the GUI as separate video tracks - but I have no idea if this is the right process to use? On v81.0, if it's relevant. Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2045 | Link |
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,318
|
mkvmerge can read Dolby Vision directly from other Matroska files or from MPEG transport streams (M2TS), but it cannot combine two raw elementary streams. Therefore the "demux the tracks with eac3to" stept is breaking this workflow. Why are you demuxing in the first place?
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v92.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2046 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2024
Posts: 2
|
Thanks for the prompt reply!
I am demuxing due to the mixed results I've had when using mkvtoolnix or other tools to read directly from mpls/m2ts. Using eac3to to demux before remuxing in a tool like mkvtoolnix has been the most reliable approach to dealing with titles that use seamless branching on the disc. Is there any way to combine the streams prior to feeding into mkvtoolnix? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2048 | Link |
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,318
|
MKVToolNix v84.0 released
Hey y'all.
MKVToolNix v84 is out, with a handful of bug fixes & a handful of enhancements. The usual stuff. Here are the usual links: the MKVToolNix home page, the downloads section and the source code. The Windows packages as well as the Linux AppImage are available already. The other Linux packages are still being built and will be available over the course of the next couple of hours. Please note that due to technical reasons I haven't been able to build the macOS disk image yet. I don't know when I'll be able to fix it. Here are the NEWS since the previous release: Version 84.0 "Sleeper" 2024-04-28 New features and enhancements
Bug fixes
Build system changes
Have fun 😁
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v92.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2049 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 10
|
Hi Mosu,
Your latest Windows binaries are signed by the sub-CA "GoGetSSL G4 CS RSA4096 SHA256 2022 CA-1" of the "DigiCert Trusted Root G4" root CA. Our Windows 10 and 11 machines do not have the sub-CA "GoGetSSL G4 CS RSA4096 SHA256 2022 CA-1", and I can't seem to find this intermediate cert anywhere. It's strange, because normally a CA will make them available for download like these: https://www.gogetssl.com/wiki/interm...-certificates/ https://www.digicert.com/kb/digicert...rtificates.htm Perhaps you can make it available on your site? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2050 | Link |
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,318
|
In general I'm strongly against making CA files available on arbitrary websites that aren't run by the organization operating the CA. It always smells incredibly bad to me. The obvious exceptions are the well-known CA bundles operated by browser vendors. But certainly not on random project websites; that always smells kind of bad to me, to be honest.
To me it looks like GoGetSSL didn't think of adding the intermediates they use for code-signing to the website you've linked to. If anything, you should ask them to add the relevant intermediates to their site.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v92.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. Last edited by Mosu; 11th May 2024 at 12:29. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2052 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 10
|
After being brushed off by GoGetSSL's incompetent L1 Support, I did a bit of research and found how to retrieve the intermediate cert's download URL!
From https://www.thesslstore.com/blog/aia-fetching/ : AIA, or Authority Information Access, is an extension in SSL certificates that provides information about the issuer. One of the purposes of this extension is to provide a link to the issuing intermediate certificate. So I examined in detail the exe's digital cert, and voila!, under the Authority Information Access [section 2] is the URL to the Gogetssl cert. See attached screenshot. Downloaded & imported it into Windows 10's cert store and binaries can be validated now ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2054 | Link |
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,318
|
That's an intentional change. UIDs are supposed to be unique & random. Having them just numbered starting from 1 poses subtle issues in certain scenarios.
So no, not a bug, and no, won't change.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v92.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2055 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 276
|
Quote:
It's changing the UIDs for tracks that are already there, not tracks that I'm adding. I'll open an MKV with 3 tracks, UIDs 1, 2, 3. Hit "start" and it'll change them. No tracks or subtitles were added. You're telling me this is intentional? It's a stupid "intention" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2056 | Link |
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,318
|
Yes, it is very much intentional.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v92.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2058 | Link |
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,318
|
MKVToolNix v85 released
Heyo!
MKVToolNix v85 is out. It's just a tiny bug fix release so that users affected by those bugs don't have to wait too long. Here are the usual links: the MKVToolNix home page, the downloads section and the source code. The Windows packages as well as the Linux AppImage are available already. The other Linux packages are still being built and will be available over the course of the next couple of hours. Please note that due to technical reasons I haven't been able to build the macOS disk image yet. I don't know when I'll be able to fix it. Here are the NEWS since the previous release: Version 85.0 "Shame For You" 2024-06-02 Bug fixes
Have fun 😁
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v92.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2059 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 230
|
Do we have an option inside MKVTOOLNIX to:
- Always tell a language for audio/subtitles should be the default one; ![]() if others are present, like spanish, they should be marked this way: ![]() For example: File has 2 audio tracks, EN and PT; plus 2 subtitles, EN and PT. All EN should be like picture #1, all PT not default (#2 ). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2060 | Link |
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,318
|
No, there are no options that do exactly what you want.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v92.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
matroska |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|