Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
2nd August 2013, 09:02 | #1 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 33
|
YATTA! vs. AnimeIVTC: what is the difference?
Can anyone explain what is the difference between those two approaches? From what I've read It seems that YATTA! is a tool for manual IVTC + frame rate difference detection (30/24 fps footage) and AnimeIVTC does the same, but it's [more] automated.
I'm asking because AnimeIVTC, at least for me, does a damn good job, but there's some people that know about YATTA! and say it might be better. Well, I'm not sure about "better", but some rank it like this: simple IVTC with whatever you have > AnimeIVTC > YATTA! Last edited by cihub; 2nd August 2013 at 17:43. Reason: Added last paragraph |
2nd August 2013, 16:39 | #3 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,695
|
QTGMC does IVTC? That's news to me. I just searched the QTGMC documentation for any mention of "telecine," "IVTC," or "decimate" and found none. AFIK, QTGMC has nothing whatsoever to do with detecting and removing duplicate or blended fields from telecined material. Its main purpose is deinterlacing and, along the way, it also lets you do some nifty denoising, along with a few other things that "come for free" because of the tools used for the deinterlacing (e.g., motion blur).
|
2nd August 2013, 17:55 | #4 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 33
|
>>>you might want to restrict it to "Yatta vs. AnimeIVTC"
Done. >>>QTGMC does IVTC? Sorry for that, I just knew that it was somehow related to field-matching in IVTC process. Still, I wonder what YATTA! does that AnimeIVTC can't. |
2nd August 2013, 19:26 | #5 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 365
|
But you can use QTGMC "inside" TFM as a postprocessor instead of the built-in ones, though i usually just use nnedi3... (might have been what the thread opener meant?)
__________________
(i have a tendency to drunk post) |
2nd August 2013, 22:48 | #6 | Link | |
Angel of Night
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tangled in the silks
Posts: 9,559
|
Quote:
Yatta will always have its diehard adherents, but hybrid detection has come a long way, most people are fine with unnoticeable rather than perfect, and newer shows mostly don't have any video segments at all. |
|
3rd August 2013, 18:40 | #7 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 33
|
Thank you guys.
>>>You explained it pretty well right there. I thought so, though afterwards I posted this thread. It's just that ranking (simple IVTC > AnimeIVTC > YATTA!) somewhat confused me and I thought that it'll be better if I ask someone who are more familiar with these tools. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|