Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
|
#25 | Link |
|
easily bamboozled user
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 373
|
Excellent. This sounds like just the option I've been needing to deal with a few very tough scenes in Terminator 2 that weren't responding well to just increased bitrate. I'll start testing it ASAP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 392
|
How deadzone interacts with in-loop deblocking? Is an low value for deblocking needed in order to get good efects from low deadzones values? Or the defaut deblocking (0,0) don't bother?
What's the diference between low deadzone setings and high bitrate CQMs? Is higher than defaut deadzone values recomended for low-bitrates? |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | Link |
|
x264 developer
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,392
|
Deadzone affects the quality-per-qp. Optimal (absolute) deblocking strength depends on quality. Actual deblocking strength (as defined by the standard and set by x264 options) is relative to qp, not relative to quality. So if you change quality-per-qp, then you might want to modify the deblocking setting.
However, the units of the deblocking setting a pretty coarse. So even if you set deadzone all the way down to 0 (not recommended), the compensating change would be to reduce deblock by at most 1 (compared to whatever deblocking you were previously using with the default deadzone). Conversely, if you increase deadzone all the way up to 32, I expect the optimal deblock setting to change by at most +1. There is no particular relationship between bitrate and optimal deadzone. Deadzone is already specified relative to the rate-distorion optimal value, so any changes are psychovisual, and not well enough tested yet to give a definitive recommendation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 56
|
A question to the people with a better insight than mine : how are the --deadzone switches correctly used ?
I've noticed that some apparently odd combinations are quite popular. For instance (4,4) or (6,6,), even (0,0)... (mind you, the first parameter stands for intra, the second for inter) AFAIK : 1. intra should have a lower value than inter 2. (0,0) shouldn't be used at all Personally, I tend to use (2,4) or (4,8) when tweaking the --deadzone settings is appropriate. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|