Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. Domains: forum.doom9.org / forum.doom9.net / forum.doom9.se |
|
|
#1 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 129
|
High Quality Up-Conversion filter
Hi guys. In your experience, what would you consider to be AVISynth filter equivalents closest to commercially available up-scaling plug-ins like InstantHD, BlowUp, Genuine Fractals, etc. The rez of some 640x360p vids need doublin' but I'm looking for something sharper than what the conventional bi-linear, bi-cubic, etc algorithms have to offer.
I looked for some pages comparing images produced with various AVISynth filters aimed at that but couldn't find anything satisfying. Thank you in advance.
__________________
CPU: Intel® Core™i7 930 @ 2.80GFz 2.79 GHz (8 cores) GPU: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTS 250 SYS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RAM: 6.00 GB |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | Link |
|
Sleepy overworked fellow
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Maple syrup's homeland
Posts: 933
|
Don't forget the new (and still in testing) eedi3 - http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.ph...68#post1343668
__________________
AnimeIVTC() - v2.00 -http://boinc.berkeley.edu/- Let all geeks use their incredibly powerful comps for the greater good (no, no, it won't slow your filtering/encoding :p) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | Link |
|
Derek Prestegard IRL
![]() Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,017
|
Using nnedi / nnedi2 in double height mode will probably be your best option
![]() If you're doing upscaling, you might want to look into some form of noise reduction, and possibly sharpening - though you should probably go easy on them both! Over filtering is always a bad idea. Take a look at LSFMod for sharpening, and FFT3DFilter / MDegrain are both excellent denoisers. Tune them carefully. ~MiSfit
__________________
These are all my personal statements, not those of my employer :) |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,407
|
If you think about what NNEDI actually is doing, you'll come to the conclusion that the result of NNEDI-upscaling *should* be sharpened in some way. Remember that NNEDI is not a scaler, but an interpolator for missing-by-decimation data. In a smooth progressive frame, there is not any data missing in this special way. E.g. a 1-pixel line with 1-pixel antialiasing on either side will be much broader in the upscaled frame than it should be ideally.
orig: 10 10 14 20 14 10 10 NNEDI: 10 xx 10 xx 14 xx 20 xx 14 xx 10 xx 10 Not quite sure how to put this in a few words ... what about "Nyquist interpolation / restoring" ? Those parts of detail that are somehow close to Nyquist frequency in the source frame, those need to be thinned in the NNEDI-upscaled frame.
__________________
- We´re at the beginning of the end of mankind´s childhood - My little flickr gallery. (Yes indeed, I do have hobbies other than digital video!) Last edited by Didée; 1st January 2010 at 18:23. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
But the basic idea is that because NNEDI is trying to restore lost (or missing?) data, and a progressive frame has no lost data, what happens is that some stuff which NNEDI *thinks* is lost data, gets strengthened, I think, no? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
It is an interesting one though... To be honest though, I didn't find much difference between lanczs and nnedi... Maybe I wasn't lookign good enought? *shrugs* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | Link | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 713
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| upscaling |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|