Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. Domains: forum.doom9.org / forum.doom9.net / forum.doom9.se |
|
|
#3681 | Link |
|
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,352
|
Sorry, but I cannot help you with that. That's tsmuxer's problem.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v101.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
|
|
|
|
#3682 | Link |
|
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,352
|
You cannot as there is no such feature at the moment, and I currently don't have any plans on implementing one mostly because mkvmerge's flexibility makes it very hard to say where such a mark would have to be put exactly.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v101.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
|
|
|
|
#3683 | Link | |
|
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,352
|
MKVToolNix v8.5.0 released
Hey,
I've released MKVToolNix v8.5.0. It contains the usual mix of bug fixes and enhancements, most of them for the GUI but some for mkvmerge, too. Most of these correspond directly to entries in the issue tracker. There's one small change for package maintainers: there's a new translation of the man pages into Catalan. Here are the usual links: the MKVToolNix home page, the Windows installer and portable version and the source code. All binaries that I provide have been uploaded already. Here's the full ChangeLog since the previous release: Quote:
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v101.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3684 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,787
|
Hi,
I installed version 8.5.0 and I don't find the GUI for MKVmerge, is it abandoned ? I prefer the ususal GUI than the new one (mkvtoolnix-gui), is there a way to continue with the usual GUI using the new mkvmerge.exe ? |
|
|
|
|
#3685 | Link |
|
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,352
|
Yes. No, at least not a supported one.
What I suggest you do instead is to start using the new GUI and telling me what you don't like about it. Maybe you're missing functions from the old GUI that you didn't know exist already in the new GUI? Or maybe trying to do things one way while not being aware that the new GUI offers you other ways, often more effective, to achieve the same result? But please be specific; I cannot do anything with a generic "I don't like it". Thanks.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v101.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
|
|
|
|
#3686 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 366
|
I don't like the layout of the header editor, it was the one thing I wanted changed from MMG but you kept it the same.
Look at the way the "merge" header elements are managed and compare it to the "edit headers" method. Is there some reason you prefer that particular layout? |
|
|
|
|
#3687 | Link |
|
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,352
|
ndjamena: I'm sorry but I don't quite get what you mean. Can you describe in more detail what kind of a layout you'd prefer to see?
What I cannot really do is list all of the properties beneath each other as in the track properties in the merge tool, if that's what you mean. There's way too much text to be displayed for such a layout not to look confusing, I'm afraid.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v101.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
|
|
|
|
#3688 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,787
|
Quote:
I don't understand why you changed the interface that was clear and to which we were used. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3690 | Link |
|
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,352
|
Because users were requesting several things that weren't possible with the old layout. A really quite common complaint was that the (old) GUI was too high, especially on notebooks with rather low resolution where the GUI wouldn't even fit. Monitors have been getting wider and less high (I had been using 1600x1200 for a long time, but try to get something > 1024 pixels high without going up to 2500x… nowadays), and the old GUI was designed exactly the wrong way around.
However: If you prefer the vertical layout used in the old GUI then with 8.5.0 you can switch the new GUI to a vertical layout, too. And "too man things written"…? Uhm, excuse me, but what? I also don't get what you mean by "little windows". Like I said, please be specific.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v101.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
|
|
|
|
#3691 | Link |
|
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,352
|
No, sorry, that would make the whole point of a tree-ish layout moot and somewhat confusing. Especially as the fact whether or not the default track flag is present in the file is actually important regarding the interpretation of the value (not present means its effective value is "yes/on" due to the element's default value).
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v101.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
|
|
|
|
#3692 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 231
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3693 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 507
|
Yep, that technique works fine with the current release. Thanks markanini!
It'll be very useful to convert extras from blu-ray disks into a single mkv. I've tried manually creating chapter files for this, but they're always off by half a second here, half a second there. |
|
|
|
|
#3694 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 366
|
To use your own argument against you, if I'm processing movie subtitles and copying "names" from one file to the next, I don't have enough vertical real estate to have more than two subtitles tracks expanded at a time without maximising the entire window. Not to mention the fact that it's difficult to blindly search and select the correct one given the current layout. There's no indication from the outside which subtitle has any particular name and after expanding the tracks the name nodes are so far apart that fitting them on the screen and finding them is a pain.
At the same time there's a whole lot of real estate in the bottom right that's just been wasted on emptiness. Checking the UIDs of each track is difficult too, you have to expand each and every one and hunt down the UID nodes. The layout is just difficult, I don't pretend to know what you're trying to accomplish or what a better solution would be but... |
|
|
|
|
#3695 | Link |
|
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,352
|
If the problem is finding the right track to modify then I can probably make that easier without a lot of work (which re-working the whole layout would require).
In the tree I already include the CodecID. In the same spirit I can incorporate more information, probably in the form of real columns and not just as text in the first column. Track name, UID, codec ID, default track flag, video resolution/audio sampling frequency & number of channels come to mind.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v101.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
|
|
|
|
#3696 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 366
|
As long as I can copy from there that would be an improvement.
How difficult would providing a dropdown box with a list of custom entries to choose from in the name section be? Too hard? I won't be too pedantic about it, it's just that I accidently deleted my batch script that renamed the tracks and now I'm stuck using the Header Editor until I can pull something together to replace it. Not that I was happy about it before then or even before the new GUI. |
|
|
|
|
#3697 | Link |
|
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,352
|
You won't be able to copy from those columns, no, but I think I'll do something in addition to those columns: I'll add some more information on the track's page and enable mouse selection for those entries. So your workflow could look like this: determine the track to click on by looking at the various columns in the tree view, click on that track's entry in the tree, select the name on the right, copy.
You can already customize which columns are shown in other views by right-clicking on the column headers; the same mechanism will apply to the tree view in the header editor, too. The header editor wasn't built for mass-modification. That's the domain of mkvpropedit, much like mass-muxing is the domain of mkvmerge and not of the GUI. Instead the header editor's current design is to be precise in how it represents the file's content and to allow the user to do exactly what (s)he wants to e.g. remove element XYZ. I may implement a whole different editing mode in the future that's more along the lines of a tabular view of editable fields for everything, but that's not that easy to implement. Other things in the GUI will have higher priority for me, though.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v101.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. |
|
|
|
|
#3698 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 366
|
I've already created simpler batch scripts for TV shows with hard coded values, the problem is every cinematic movie is unique and needs more complicated routines to help fill them in, hence the manual copy/pasting at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
#3699 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 81
|
Quote:
This is useful in the case where different video processing may need to be done on separate chapters within say, a DVD, for example. We separate the chapters (or VOBs) perform our processing on the segments then rejoin them back into a single large MKV. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3700 | Link |
|
MKVToolNix author
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Posts: 4,352
|
Like I said, mkvmerge is flexible. There are cases for which such a functionality would be more or less easy to implement: a typical file with a single video track, one or more audio tracks. In such a case the start of the next file would probably be the first video track's timestamp. Oh wait, video tracks actually don't have to start with an I frame (think open GOP), so first I frame's timestamp.
Yeah ok. But what about files with multiple video tracks? Which video track do I use in that case? The first? What if the second one has its "default track flag" set instead of the first one? Which one is actullay the "first" if the user re-orders the tracks so that the second from the source file will be the first in the input file? Next case: two video tracks in different files (meaning you have four files in total, mux two of them in parallel and append one to each of the other so that the output file will contain two video tracks). Now it's quite possible (likel, even) that one of the video tracks' first file is shorter than the other. So how to I handle that situation? Create two chapter entries? Only one? If only one then the same as the question above applies. What if you're appending different number of files? Yes, I have had reports from users doing just that: they had three video segments and two audio segments, all of which would end up with the same total length. Imagine a situation with two video tracks and different number of segments. Same question as above: where should it create chapter markings? mkvmerge appends on a track-by-track basis, not on a file-by-file basis. That's what makes it incredibly flexible. But it also means that such new functionality requires a lot of thought in order to get it right, and a lot of effort to implement and test properly. I'm not willing to invest that time. I would love for someone to step up and offer code for this, but my experience from the past is that apart from minor bug fixes people only contribute to MKVToolNix in the form of translations, not code. That's quite OK, but that also means that I'm the only person to implement new features, and my time is limited. So please respect that I sometimes simply don't _want_ to tackle an issue, even if it would fit into its scope and design. Thanks.
__________________
Latest MKVToolNix is v101.0 If I ever ask you to upload something, please use my file server. Last edited by Mosu; 19th October 2015 at 14:56. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|