Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. Domains: forum.doom9.org / forum.doom9.net / forum.doom9.se |
|
|
#21 | Link | |
|
Formerly davidh*****
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,888
|
Quote:
![]() Apologies for the following large and annoying animated GIF, but this may be the easiest way to make sure everyone is on the same page: ![]() Rica, can you explain what, if anything, you find "wrong" with this image (and this image alone)? Is this the kind of "shakiness" you think is a problem? David Last edited by wonkey_monkey; 3rd January 2013 at 00:43. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | Link |
|
Formerly davidh*****
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,888
|
Interleave functions perfectly! I don't think any of us understand what the problem you are having is - my own suspicion is that you have misunderstood something, and there is in fact no problem to be solved.
David |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | Link | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,017
|
Quote:
(And why don't you make an animation consisting of two frames taken from stack horizontal or original left and right frames? For instance frames 190 and 191? This will be a real animation of interleaving. If you make it and if we don't meet this belly dancing, I suppose you will understand me. - I mean 190-L+190-R +191-L +191-R.) Last edited by rica; 3rd January 2013 at 00:59. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | Link | |
|
Formerly davidh*****
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,888
|
Then there is no problem. If encoded correctly, and viewed on a correctly set-up 3D display in interleave mode, your interleaved video will look exactly the same as your SBS video displayed on a 3D display in SBS mode.
This "shakiness" is an inherent factor of 3D video. I really don't know what you expect it to be like, other than this. Quote:
David |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | Link | |
|
Formerly davidh*****
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,888
|
Quote:
Edited to add: Are you trying to create what everyone else calls "interleaved 3D" but would in fact be better described as "interlaced 3D"? Code:
left=ffmpegsource2("left.mkv")
right=ffmpegsource2("right.mkv")
interleave(left,right)
separatefields
selectevery(4,0,3)
weave
Last edited by wonkey_monkey; 3rd January 2013 at 01:00. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,017
|
David, I see what I see on VirtualDubMod playing to interleave.
I can not make an animation since there is no SW in my home PC to compare. Sorry but it doesn't seem they are the twins taken from the original L and R. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | Link | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,017
|
Quote:
Mine is: Code:
lv=bla bla rv=bla bla interleave (lv,rv) Quote:
No, I don't think I am doing something wrong. I tried with avs and encoded video using SP in 3D mode. SP, set to frame-sequential (left image first) and nVidia selected as viewing method. I also gave it a go with PDVD 12. And please do not forget I can watch SBS very well with those programs in 3D mode. Last edited by rica; 3rd January 2013 at 01:32. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#31 | Link |
|
Formerly davidh*****
![]() Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,888
|
I tried your interleave.mkv in Stereoscopic Player in anaglyph mode and it looked fine to me - although it did play back at half speed. Do you still get shakiness when you use anaglyph mode? Did you try encoding with --fps 50?
David |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | Link |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,017
|
Sneaker and David, thanks!
Finally I fixed the issue with encoding the video to 50 fps. I did not think interleave filter needs 2*fps while SBS and TB methods are OK with 1*fps. Slow motion creates the shaking issue. This looks great with SP in 3D mode while PDVD still shakes it since it does not have frame sequential option. Thanks again. Code:
C:\test>x264 --fps 50.00 --level 4.1 --sar 1:1 --frame-packing 5 -o final_03.mkvnewest_interleave_01.avs http://www.mediafire.com/?u2bdcfn1fczdvpr _ _ _ _ _ Last edited by rica; 4th January 2013 at 00:36. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|