Quote:
Originally Posted by Groucho2004
real.finder got the cause for this right. Also, just curious - why are you using 2.6.1 Alpha and not 2.6.0?
|
Just 1 reason:
Version 2.61 contains a newer and much better version of TimeStretch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Groucho2004
My experience is the exact opposite. AVS+ uses less memory than classic. Have you verified this with AVSMeter?
|
We had this discussion before, no need to test it again. Look here:
https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.p...68#post1863768
Of course I had to use a Non-SSE2 version of AVS+ for my machine. And AvsMeter clearly shows that there is no advantage whatsoever using AVS+ on this computer. All the new features of AVS+ are not for me, I have no interest in high bitdepth or hi colors, and UHD or even HD clips are not usable on this machine anyways.