View Single Post
Old 5th August 2016, 17:59   #6  |  Link
james1201
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by feisty2 View Post
Well, any algorithmic differences?
for algo=0, it's completely the same as the old ones.
(this is the default)

for algo=1, do more accurate computing on the average values, but much slower.

I found that algo=1 might be the correct one after I reversed the assembly code back into plain c code...
perhaps I'm wrong?

however, it's not necessary to use algo=1, it's too slow and may not produce a much better result IMO.

so just use the default one, algo=0, which is the same as the old AVISynth SangNom2.
james1201 is offline   Reply With Quote