View Single Post
Old 21st June 2005, 05:57   #19  |  Link
Keng!
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Malaysia!
Posts: 11
Hi!
Great to hear that the comparison is coming back for 2nd round! Here is my suggestion, how about include the codecs's compressibility and performance (speed) in the comparison? Coz in the last comparison, only the codecs's quality is tested. In my opinion, the compressibility and performance also is an important part of the codec (also the part we interested, besides quality). In the last comparison, you guys said is too early to test the codecs's compatibility, so how about this time? In last comparison, Ateme MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 beat all the codecs who took part, let see what will happens this time when x264 kick in!
Keng! is offline   Reply With Quote