Doom9's Forum - View Single Post

tritical · 20th May 2007, 23:27

@DarkNite
Thanks, though if you don't remember where it was don't worry about it too much... I'm sure you have better things to do with your free time

.

@All
I have managed to fix the mode 2 problems. The drifting on long sequences that Xesdeeni reported was caused by having a '>' instead of a '>='. The crash ChiDragon reported was caused by a bug in the sorting algorithm that was used for very large cycles (could only happen when using mode 2 with an input file and non-standard framerates). I also made some minor improvements.

I'm still trying to duplicate the mode 5 problem. I've been comparing TIVTC v1.0 RC1 vs v1.0.1 on a few hybrid sources and have yet to see any major differences. Although, I did find a bug in tfm's cubic pping. The handling of the very last line (for field=1) and very first line (for field=0) has been slightly messed up since ~ April, 06.

20th May 2007, 23:27	#1045 \| Link
tritical Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: MO, US Posts: 999	@DarkNite Thanks, though if you don't remember where it was don't worry about it too much... I'm sure you have better things to do with your free time . @All I have managed to fix the mode 2 problems. The drifting on long sequences that Xesdeeni reported was caused by having a '>' instead of a '>='. The crash ChiDragon reported was caused by a bug in the sorting algorithm that was used for very large cycles (could only happen when using mode 2 with an input file and non-standard framerates). I also made some minor improvements. I'm still trying to duplicate the mode 5 problem. I've been comparing TIVTC v1.0 RC1 vs v1.0.1 on a few hybrid sources and have yet to see any major differences. Although, I did find a bug in tfm's cubic pping. The handling of the very last line (for field=1) and very first line (for field=0) has been slightly messed up since ~ April, 06.