Yes i read it and yes i understand what you wrote above but in the END you madeup a Final conclusion that reads:
Quote:
Finally, the problem of patents appears to be rearing its ugly head again. VP8 is simply way too similar to H.264: a pithy, if slightly inaccurate, description of VP8 would be “H.264 Baseline Profile with a better entropy coder”. Though I am not a lawyer, I simply cannot believe that they will be able to get away with this, especially in today’s overly litigious day and age. Even VC-1 differed more from H.264 than VP8 does, and even VC-1 didn’t manage to escape the clutches of software patents.
|
This is a Final conclusion on your side a final statement that says "They wont get away with this Patent Violation"
And this from the Mouth from someone like you is everything mass media waits for to make up a story from. And the Stock Market reacting.
I thought MPEG directly would attack but not in my "darkest dreams" i would have thought that you would be the initial reason that starts this all, and everyone of the other side hops behind searching cover for it :P