19th April 2012, 14:13
|
#1187
| Link
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didée
The sharpening method is "temporal limited contra-sharpening". (Well, usually. You can opt to use a purely spatial variant, but that one is substantially "less good" in the given context.)
The method could be extracted into a stand-alone, that's perfectly possible. But it wouldn't make too much sense to use it in conjunction with another (fast) deinterlacer. For the given sharpening method, one full circle of motion-search and motion-compensation must be done via MVTools, plus the temporal limiting in itself.
Read: if you would have it as a stand-alone, then it would be rather slow. You would loose most of the "speed benefit" of PureVideo, the result would be similarly-slow as QTGMC is anyway.
On top of that, if you sharpen the PureVideo Deinterlacer in the same way as QTGMC does, then the ("per-pixel") deficits of PureVideo would become more pronounced.
|
Thanks for the answer friend.
__________________
MhX Digital - An Old Fan Of x264
|
|
|