View Single Post
Old 6th September 2015, 13:07   #15  |  Link
BadFrame
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by mandarinka View Post
That is just implementation detail of decoder/encoder. They could implement frame threading like in x264 with no problem.
I'm not at all certain of that, I would expect that there are patents regarding multi-threaded encoding methods as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mandarinka View Post
I'm afraid it is just lack of care from Google. Threading is hard, Youtube doesn't need it, let's go shopping.
But they have implemented multi-threaded encoding, if they didn't need it why bother in the first place ? The multi-threading method is obviously very resolution dependent, why settle for such a limitation if they don't have to ?

If what you say is true, they could just re-implement the method x264 has for multi-threading the encoding workload, yet they don't.
BadFrame is offline   Reply With Quote