Quote:
Originally Posted by yesgrey3
Yes, DD still has better numbers, but the difference is smaller.
|
It's not because of lossless source. With 1 minute sample I've previously posted I get results that differ from the whole track results in the same way:
Code:
Name | SNR | PEAQ
448 kbps
DD6, L | 23.382| -0.205
aften, L | 19.154| -0.582
And the difference is not "smaller". Look at PEAQ values.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yesgrey3
I would also like to see the numbers with 640kbps...
|
Code:
Name | SNR | PEAQ
640 kbps
DD6, L | 27.809| -0.039
aften, L | 22.764| -0.172
DD6, C | 28.911| 0.003
aften, C | 22.982| -0.056
Quote:
Originally Posted by raquete
i'm interested to hear as encoding with aften for long time feel better results when comparing with softencode or with the Dolby encoder inside sound forge 9.
|
Here is "Quantum of Solace" source wav, output.448.DD6.ac3 and output.224.DD6.ac3. You can get compiled aften from
MeGUI server. Try to compare DD encoding with default aften frequency range and with tweaked through -w option.
But you should note, that all these numbers are mostly about development. If you feel that aften "sounds better" then you should use it.