View Single Post
Old 8th July 2008, 08:33   #43  |  Link
Alex_ander
Registered User
 
Alex_ander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia
Posts: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by florinandrei View Post
I was thinking I should just do 1080i -> 480p at 30fps, since 480p/30fps, while not a DVD standard, is apparently supported by some (many?) DVD players. You know, just deinterlace and be done with it.
But then, these DVDs will be played on interlaced CRT displays, so it's probably better (?) to keep it interlaced.
There's no incompatibility of progressive footage on DVD with interlaced display: the video is outputted by fields (fake interlaced if progressive) from any standard DVD player. The main reason for keeping video interlaced is preserving better motion reproduction. When you deinterlace without doubling frame rate (you can only double it for PC or for 720p TV playback) you lose half of motion phases and get some artifacts.
Alex_ander is offline   Reply With Quote