View Single Post
Old 17th September 2008, 20:02   #192  |  Link
Sagekilla
x264aholic
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 1,752
@kemuri-_9: That may be true, but crf is a very attractive alternative if you want a slightly faster encode (especially with prefiltering, or transcoding HD content) with consistent quality across the whole encode. Both are valid for what they're best in (2-pass for specific size, crf for specific quality).
__________________
You can't call your encoding speed slow until you start measuring in seconds per frame.
Sagekilla is offline