Quote:
Originally Posted by videoh
Sure, those qualify as "motion between fields" too.
|
Linguists and physicists, and pretty much the entire english-speaking world, disagree with you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by videoh
But you made the false claim
|
There was nothing false about it. You can have motion without interlacing (it's called "progressive" video) and I already gave several examples of visible interlacing without motion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by videoh
What matters is whether the picture content changes across a field pair.
|
Agreed. And that's not the same thing as motion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LigH
"Combing" (while watching a whole frame) gets only visible for areas in motion
|
Or if the picture changes for any other reason.