View Single Post
Old 5th October 2015, 19:27   #46  |  Link
Asmodian
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 4,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Khanattila View Post
Agree, but the input can have infinite precision like natural logarithm. Euler's number is not a ratio of integers and it is not a root of any non-zero polynomial with rational coefficients. Like log (param).

EDIT. Forget it... you always think that the input is only 'param'.
No, in computers it cannot. Computers don't do infinite precision. The input will always have finite precision.

Quote:
Originally Posted by feisty2 View Post
@vivan
you and I have different perceptions of "lossless", I can live with that
but please don't drag physics stuff here, computers do mathematical calculations, not physical experiments
Vivan's point was a mathematical one, not a physical one.

If you can only output integers there is a point where keeping track of extra precision cannot change the result at all. This point depends on the equation(s), of course, but it can be calculated with certainty. In physics/chemistry it is based on the precision of your measurements while in computers it is based on the precision of your input and output.
__________________
madVR options explained
Asmodian is offline   Reply With Quote