View Single Post
Old 19th May 2008, 04:11   #95  |  Link
MarcioAB
Registered User
 
MarcioAB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 157
It seems DivX H264 delivers around 15% more fps than ffdshow. Over here with a 720p source I got 10% more when renderer is VMR and 120% more when VMR9 - that is interesting to me because I use subtitles (VMR9).

DivX and CoreAVC similar, specially on VRM9.

Turning Deband ON in ffdshow (what is a must for me because the x264 issue with blocks on dark areas) drops it's speed by 40%. With DivX H264 there is no impact turning deblock on/off, but also the image does not change - I see the blocks. The same with CoreAVC (a little bit more blocks than DivX).


ffdshow:
110 fps (VMR) (CPU @ 80%)
100 fps (VMR9) (CPU @ 80%)

DivX H264
120 fps (VMR) (CPU @ 90%)
118 fps (VMR9) (CPU @ 65%) (Obs: deblock on/off, latency on/off)

CoreAVC
120 fps (VMR) (CPU @ 65%)
119 fps (VMR9) (CPU @ 70%)

CPU 6600@2.40GHz (dual-core) - 1GB RAM DDR2 400MHz - GeForce GTS 8600

Last edited by MarcioAB; 19th May 2008 at 13:28. Reason: included graphics card info
MarcioAB is offline   Reply With Quote