Thread: Avisynth+
View Single Post
Old 17th October 2013, 02:19   #157  |  Link
TurboPascal7
Registered User
 
TurboPascal7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 270
There is not much point in compiling avs+ with ICL right now. However it will be "a must" for optimal performance after some code gets ported to intrinsics as VC tends to do a pretty bad job here. I also can confirm that auto-vectorization does not and probably will never help avs core much.

Next, I do not believe that there should be several differently compiled version of avisynth flying around and I would like to ask other people to refrain from posting binaries at least for now as it might just create additional confusion. In the end I believe the best solution would be to provide one binary, built with ICL, as code it generates for intrinsics seems to be faster than VC even on AMD processors. Getting ICL is not hard even if you are not a student.

As for benchmark methods, I think AvsMeter is pretty much the standard tool right now.

Last edited by TurboPascal7; 17th October 2013 at 02:35.
TurboPascal7 is offline