Doom9's Forum - View Single Post

IanB · 13th August 2009, 23:49

@SEt,

Thanks, you must be psychic I noticed the 2nd issue while reading your other big change bundle. It is still not quite right. In the MT case CacheHead could be NUL because CacheMT doesn't implement the new poke cache stuff yet, so you exit the loop without actually using "the smallest VFB that is bigger than our size". that's the trouble with quickly retro fitting code from the main branch.

As for the 1st bit with g_Bin yeah it's stuffed. I am not happy with that whole concept, so .....

13th August 2009, 23:49	#14 \| Link
IanB Avisynth Developer Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 3,167	@SEt, Thanks, you must be psychic I noticed the 2nd issue while reading your other big change bundle. It is still not quite right. In the MT case CacheHead could be NUL because CacheMT doesn't implement the new poke cache stuff yet, so you exit the loop without actually using "the smallest VFB that is bigger than our size". that's the trouble with quickly retro fitting code from the main branch. As for the 1st bit with g_Bin yeah it's stuffed. I am not happy with that whole concept, so .....