I don' t thinkAssumeFieldBased doesn't do what you might think it does (At least I think it doesn't)
he he no I don't know what it does but it solves my problem
here some pictures
------------------------------------------------------------
MPEG2Source("C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\DvdKhl\Eigene Dateien\Encoding Stuff\1.d2v",cpu2="oooooo",idct=6,iPP=false)
-------------------------------------------------------------
MPEG2Source("C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\DvdKhl\Eigene Dateien\Encoding Stuff\1.d2v",cpu2="oooooo",idct=6,iPP=false)
assumefieldbased()
separatefields()
weave()
-------------------------------------------------------------
MPEG2Source("C:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\DvdKhl\Eigene Dateien\Encoding Stuff\1.d2v",cpu2="oooooo",idct=6,iPP=false)
separatefields()
weave()

-------------------------------------------------------------
without assumefieldbased() the commands separatefields(),weave()
in the script do nothing but with it like in the 2. example it makes the frames it progressive. But if you zoom the (progressive) picture so you can see the pixels you can notice that the 1&2, 3&4 ... horizontal lines are the same
I just wanted to upload a little vob file but my webspace doesn't let me upload file bigger than 500kb :/.
-----------------------------------------------
There are many guides on this on this site etc.
Try also searching the forums.
-----------------------------------------------
I already did. But they always say to deinterlace, but I think I get the best result with my script.
I just want to know if there's a better method, and I want to know the reason why they "interlace" that way and doubling the height.