Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

  

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Search Forums
Reload this Page Search Results
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Showing results 1 to 7 of 7
Search took 0.00 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: Zarxrax
Forum: New and alternative video codecs 11th October 2021, 22:15
Replies: 65
Views: 25,695
Posted By Zarxrax
The website for YULS states that it has a maximum...

The website for YULS states that it has a maximum resolution of 1024 x 768. If this is true, I can't see that codec being very useful these days, as most people are going to have footage larger than...
Forum: New and alternative video codecs 10th October 2021, 18:53
Replies: 65
Views: 25,695
Posted By Zarxrax
Dunno, I haven't played with it much aside from...

Dunno, I haven't played with it much aside from just checking if I got lossless output. I would guess the speed setting is the most important thing after the --lossless option.
Forum: New and alternative video codecs 10th October 2021, 18:37
Replies: 65
Views: 25,695
Posted By Zarxrax
That was a very old version of x264 now. There...

That was a very old version of x264 now. There were numerous improvements to lossless encoding after that, including revision 994 which was said to improve lossless encoding by 4-25%.
Forum: New and alternative video codecs 10th October 2021, 18:24
Replies: 65
Views: 25,695
Posted By Zarxrax
Per the thread you linked, people responded that...

Per the thread you linked, people responded that the wrong settings were used.

I just did my own test in x265 and it did turn out completely mathematically lossless.
Forum: New and alternative video codecs 10th October 2021, 17:54
Replies: 65
Views: 25,695
Posted By Zarxrax
PNG is a very old technology. Modern formats like...

PNG is a very old technology. Modern formats like AV1 should easily outperform it.

Also, if size is the biggest concern, you need a codec that makes heavy use of temporal compression. X264, X265,...
Forum: New and alternative video codecs 10th October 2021, 16:56
Replies: 65
Views: 25,695
Posted By Zarxrax
No but it might be a bit smaller. For me speed is...

No but it might be a bit smaller. For me speed is at least semi-important so I was good with x264. If you really want small size, I think its worth considering making just a very high quality encode...
Forum: New and alternative video codecs 10th October 2021, 15:30
Replies: 65
Views: 25,695
Posted By Zarxrax
I have also been looking for recent comparisons...

I have also been looking for recent comparisons but not found anything.
Purely from a size standpoint (for example, to archive footage), I have found x264 to be significantly smaller than any of the...
Showing results 1 to 7 of 7

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:03.

Doom9.org - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.