Log in

View Full Version : first post, howdy pilgrim


wrocnrob
7th September 2005, 21:08
Many thanks to len0x for making a diffcult subject easier to follow. I may actually learn more about the process, as I can follow it happening.

riddle#1) I've got an Averatec 3200 series laptop (1.6ghz AMD\w a very slow bus), that will encode Nero ASP at 3-4x realtime. Using Xvid with AutoGk is taking about 5-6x realtime. Am I probably doing something wrong? I thought Xvid was faster?
I like to backup music videos and theatrical movie trailers. I have been keeping the file sizes around 40% of the original or about 2-3 mbps. I have the latest version of Xvid and it looks better than anything I've encoded with Nero's ASP.
Is it possible for AutoGk to use my Nero ACC? I'm not a programmer, or I would try it.

len0x
7th September 2005, 21:21
Quality never comes for free, so its perfectly normal for XviD be slower that Nero. What is Nero ACC?

wrocnrob
8th September 2005, 05:13
ah...um...I think I was meaning HE AAC? Sounds pretty good, whatever it is. Thanks for the reply. It doesn't seem that encoding should take so long, but I see alot of users here have some xspeedy machines.

wrocnrob
8th September 2005, 05:30
I guess AAC wouldn't fit with the .avi container very well huh...

Sharktooth
8th September 2005, 13:02
no, but avimuxgui can put AAC in AVI with no major drawbacks.
so:
1. download avimuxgui
2. encode the audio with nero and demux it to raw AAC
3. take note of the filesize
4. choose a final filesize for your encode and subtract the audio filesize
5. round down the value you obtained, this should compensate the overhead (for example 638MB->630MB)
6. encode the video ONLY with AutoGK using your custom filesize
7. mux audio and video with avimuxgui

wrocnrob
9th September 2005, 06:05
Can't be that simple. This new version of Xvid is gonna rock with AAC.

That said, I've noticed that decoding high quality .avi is a burden for the ol'Averatec. It plays, but all the memory has to be free. Is AVC any better in this respect?

wrocnrob
12th September 2005, 00:09
encoding the audio in CBR mp3 works better for decoding than VBR-- somethin to do with overhead I think; I've yet to try AAC with avimuxgui.
Nothing seems to match the fluid playback of the original mpeg2 stream, they're pretty sharp on a 12" screen. I might just use these instead of transcoding.