Log in

View Full Version : PgcEdit 061 Beta [Problem(?)]


mad-eddy
19th August 2005, 17:41
Hello.
First: Please excuse my bad Englisch. I am a German...

Ok. Problem: I use the current Version 0.6.1 beta4 and receive with load from 2 different Projects the following Message:

http://x2.putfile.com/8/23011083265.jpg (http://www.putfile.com)

In the second Projekt the message appears also for VTS2 and 3. Before these 3 equal, get I however still that here:

http://x2.putfile.com/8/23011331099.jpg (http://www.putfile.com)

The Windows does not appear with the Version 0.6.0. The 061beta 1-3 were not tested!
Questions:
1) Is this is a new Function or an Error in the Beta?
2) Which actually means exactly the Text? Sorry, this time I do not understand it. :rolleyes:

cu

r0lZ
19th August 2005, 21:35
That's not a new function. It is the "Fix Number of Streams in VMGM/VTSI_MAT Tables" that is now called when a new DVD is loaded.

The audio and subpic streams are defined in the VMGM_MAT and the VTSI_MAT tables, and are used by the PGCs. Often, the number of streams defined in the tables doesn't match the streams really used by the PGCs. For example, with some authoring programs, all the 8 audio and 32 subpic streams are defined, but, of course, most of them are useless. If you load the DVD in, for example, DVDShrink, you will see all the streams, but most of them are empty. This situation is very confusing.

At the request of 2COOL (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=687221#post687221), this situation is now checked automatically when the DVD is loaded. If one discrepancy is found, you got the first dialog. If several discrepancies are found, the second dialog shows up. In both cases, you may cancel them, but IMHO, it is better to do the fixes.

If you don't want this automatic check, you may turn it off with the "Input/Output -> Automatically fix number of streams in VMGM/VTSI_MAT tables" option. This option was requested by arsmori (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=698186#post698186).

mad-eddy
19th August 2005, 21:57
Thanks you @r0lZ.
Ok. I understand now.

By the way: Special owing to for the mad Program!

Still one asks. I have there a suggestion for an improvement. If you had interest and time, to listen to you...?
greet

r0lZ
19th August 2005, 22:01
Feel free to suggest whatever you want. If I find the suggestion useful, I may implement it.

2COOL
19th August 2005, 22:02
@r0lZ

I haven't checked out the new beta and also I'm not home at the moment. Did you implement blutach's idea here (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=687276#post687276).?

r0lZ
19th August 2005, 22:08
Did you implement blutach's idea here (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=687276#post687276).?See my recent answer to this question here (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p=700975#post700975).

2COOL
19th August 2005, 22:17
:thanks:
:stupid:

mad-eddy
22nd August 2005, 07:54
Feel free to suggest whatever you want. If I find the suggestion useful, I may implement it.
OK. Then loosely.

I thought of an extension respectively change the menus Pgc treatment.
More exactly: Me disturbs during processing (reduction) of extra large (40-60Pgc) menus, which one must copy and/or exchange everyone individually. I would find it better, if one marks several Pgc at the same time and then delete or place against others copy could.

I have an idea like one that to solve could, however I do not possess your expertise whether am such a thing feasible. For this reason, stop I for the time being the mouth, until you expressed yourself to the thing. :p

I hope that was understandable for all. Otherwise I would when desired also try to explain the whole with an example.
I hope the desire am somehow convertible.

Greeting

r0lZ
22nd August 2005, 11:16
Well, it's possible, but I have to make an interface with all PGCs in a listbox. Something like the main command editor pane. It's a big job.
And since, when copying or swapping PGCs, the references to the original PGCs are still not fixed, it's a function that must be used only when you really need it, for example when you rewrite manually all commands in the menu domain. I don't think many users are sufficiently experienced to do that.
In short: there are many other improvments to do in PgcEdit before this one. Sorry.