View Full Version : Qmatop and Dvd Rebuilder Pro 0.93.2
alfixdvd
27th May 2005, 16:34
Qmatop don't work with Dvd Rebuilder Pro 0.92.2
When Dvd Rebuilder finishes Prepare Qmatop don't start.
With Dvd Rebuilder 0.92.1 all's right.
What's changed ?
SAPSTAR
27th May 2005, 17:14
Hmmm strange I had no issue with it ?!? I'll check that.....
[EDIT] I just noticed that I never tried with 0.93.2 only with 0.93.1...I'll check what changed.
Fishman0919
27th May 2005, 17:26
Some here.... QMatOp w/ dvd-rb 0.93.2 works for me.
SAPSTAR
27th May 2005, 17:56
@alfixdvd
try this : http://qmatop.9k.com/DVDRBInterface.rar
Unrar it in the QMatOp directory, it will replace the current DVDRBInterface. It should work fine now...let me know.
@Fishman0919
I think he's right...I found a change in the internal button numbers from DVD-RB.
Fishman0919
27th May 2005, 18:01
ok, you know I haven't try dvd-rb 0.93.2 w/QMatOp yet it was .93.1
LOL.... more testing hehe
alfixdvd
27th May 2005, 18:32
Originally posted by SAPSTAR
@alfixdvd
try this : http://qmatop.9k.com/DVDRBInterface.rar
Unrar it in the QMatOp directory, it will replace the current DVDRBInterface. It should work fine now...let me know.
@Fishman0919
I think he's right...I found a change in the internal button numbers from DVD-RB.
Sorry I can download:
Forbidden
Remote Host: [xx.xx.xx.xxx]
You do not have permission to access http://qmatop.9k.com/DVDRBInterface.rar
Data files must be stored on the same site they are linked from.
Thank you for using 9k
[Edited]
If I don't use the link and I access directly your web all's right.
alfixdvd
27th May 2005, 19:11
Sapstar the new DVDRBInterface.exe works
Thanks for your reply so fast
Lo_RaT_PeNaT
28th May 2005, 11:19
Hello, am I using the Dvd Rebuilder Pro 93.2, and have I replaced as the DvdRbInterface.exe you say, in the directory of the qmatop, and to the while of beginning the one does prepare, does you stop to work and does the program conclude, should I continue using the one that comes with the two files rar?
I should also say that the final size that I obtain with this version of the rebuilder, and the qmatop (old dvdrbinterface.exe, the new one doesn't work me.- Windows Xp), different a lot in the obtained final result with the rebuilder, the same movie, using final qmatop+HC 3.02 Gb and qmatop+CEE, result final 5.40 gb, I opened another thread where I explain that happened
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&postid=661109#post661109
Alfixdvd i have also proven your configuration that you suggested in:
http://www.dvdadvdr.com/forums/archive/topic/46776-1.html
with the same result, I hit my configuration here the rebuilder ini again, and of the qmatop ini, to a single pass in both encoders.
REBUILDER INI
[Options]
HCTargetSectors=2261000
CCE=3
LoadPlugin=1
Completed=105
EncoderMinimized=1
HalfExtras=0
idct7Opt=1
DECOMBFlag=1
Mode=5
OneClick=1
HalfD1=00
Convert_16_9=00
DisableInterlace=10
Reminder=80
SkinVersion=5
HC_Quality=3
HC_OPV=1
DCPrec=3
MovieOnly=0
ISO_Output=0
iDCT=7
[CCEOptions]
VBR_bias=20
Quality_prec=12
eclPasses=6
OPV=0
[Paths]
CCENEW=C:\Archivos de programa\Custom Technology\CCE SP Trial Version\cctspt.exe
Source=D:\PELICULAS\EL AVIADOR REMAKE\
Working=D:\PELICULAS\AVIADOR\
MPEG2DEC=C:\Archivos de programa\DVD-RB PRO\DGDecode.dll
DECOMB=C:\Archivos de programa\DVD-RB PRO\Filters\Decomb521.dll
REJIG=C:\Archivos de programa\DVD-RB PRO\Encoders\ReJig\ReJig.exe
Output=D:\PELICULAS\AVIADOR\
HC=C:\Archivos de programa\DVD-RB PRO\Encoders\HC Encoder\HCbatch.EXE
QuEnc=C:\Archivos de programa\DVD-RB PRO\Encoders\QuEnc\QuEnc.exe
ProCoder=C:\Archivos de programa\DVD-RB PRO\Encoders\EclPro\EclPro.exe
[Audio]
Selected=11
[Subpictures]
Selected=111
QMATOP.INI
workdir=D:\PELICULAS\aviador\D2VAVS
tolerance=2
framesplitperiod=12
AutoEncode=1
AutoRebuild=1
Animation=0
RangeLimit=255
QualityPrecAuto=1
CCESP26X=0
VbrBiasAuto=1
GOPAuto=1
alfixdvd
28th May 2005, 11:54
Hello Lo_Rat_Penat
I'm use always 2-pass for HC, and the result is quite adjusted. On the other hand 1-pass mode is quite inexact.
Lo_RaT_PeNaT
28th May 2005, 11:59
do you want to tell me that if I use that configuration with the qmatop to two pass in the HC, you will give me those results?, you is that I am beginning to think about the possibility that you is the Dvd Rebuilder in your versions 93.2 they are the constituents of the lag time, nevertheless I will prove what you say, thank you
Lo_RaT_PeNaT
28th May 2005, 12:19
Good, because you seems that the misfortunes don't come alone, I have proven the program again, Dvd Rebuilder For 93.2+Qmatop, with the movie Arahan, and while suddenly in the phase he/she gets ready you leaves this:
http://es.geocities.com/cumul2003/error.jpg
-- Encoding resulted in no .M2V, retrying.
-- Encoding resulted in no .M2V, retrying.
Does you fade the qmatop and next the rebuilder, some advice?
alfixdvd
28th May 2005, 16:23
See this threads
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=93914&highlight=.m2v+file+exists
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=93493&highlight=.m2v+file+exists
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=92894&highlight=.m2v+file+exists
They Can help you
hutch1711
28th May 2005, 18:36
Originally posted by Lo_RaT_PeNaT
QMATOP.INI
workdir=D:\PELICULAS\aviador\D2VAVS
tolerance=2
framesplitperiod=12
AutoEncode=1
AutoRebuild=1
Animation=0
RangeLimit=255
QualityPrecAuto=1
CCESP26X=0
VbrBiasAuto=1
GOPAuto=1
BTW if you are using CCE the QMATOp.ini RangeLimit should be set to =127. It has also been suggested, at least for now, that GOPAuto be set to =0.
Lo_RaT_PeNaT
28th May 2005, 18:47
from my point of view, you doesn't have anything to do with the configuration neither of the rebuilder.ini, neither of the dgdecode.dll, not you what happens, but I have carried out the following test
Dvd Rebuilder 0.93.2 Pro+HC at 1pass------> m2v doesn't exist
Dvd REbulder 0.93.2 Pro+HC+Qmato------- > m2v doesn't exist
Dvd Rebuilder 0.93.2 Pro+CCE to 1 pass------> m2v doesn't exist
Dvd Rebuilder 0.93.2 Pro+CCE a6 pass------- > Any problem
Dvd Rebuilder 0.92 For, with anyone of the previous combinations, any problem, conclusion, something has modified, because what is evident is that if with 0.93.2 o'clock even the 0.93 For, they arise those problem and with 0.92 o'clock For to same configuration, I don't find you another explanation.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.