View Full Version : Sorenson AVC Pro against Nero AVC h264.
guada 2
18th March 2005, 01:05
Sorenson AVC Pro against Nero AVC h264.
The difference of quality video is edifying.
When I think that some players of Divx want to promote this format, I am disappointed. :(
Try the version 4.0.301.11 of Sorenson Squeeze + the update; and you will see.
This program also permits functions advanced in HD, WMV9 HD, Quicktime HD, RV10 HD and MPEG2 HD (but in one pass to 25400 kbps).
Note: Reassure yourselves I made only a test in Mpeg-4.
To soon.
acidsex
18th March 2005, 02:02
I bought Sorenson Squeeze 4 when it first came out and it was way slow and the quality was horrible. Have they since updated and made quality improvements?
guada 2
18th March 2005, 02:24
Have you got the options that I specified upstream.
" This program also permits functions advanced in HD, WMV9 HD, Quicktime HD, RV10 HD and MPEG2 HD (but in one pass to 25400 kbps)".
Because some improvements have brought .
Sirber
18th March 2005, 02:38
Their GUI always crash :rolleyes:
guada 2
18th March 2005, 02:44
some informations
For the RV10 codec / WMV9 / Quicktime / Mpeg-4 (2 options possilbles Sorenson AVC Pro / Mpeg-4 AVC Pro):
HD 1080 hi 8000kbps
HD 1080 lo 6000kbps
HD 720 hi 5000kbps
HD 720 hi 3000kbps
For The Mpeg 1/2 :
HD 1080 D Theater 25400kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR
HD 1080 HD_ATSC_MAXss 19000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR
HD HD 1080 HI 18000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR
HD HD 1080 Lo 10000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR
HD HD 720 HI 16000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR
HD HD 720 HI 000 kbps 1 VBR pass or CBR
guada 2
18th March 2005, 02:47
Sirber, I think that you have a problem.
It requires QuickTime 6.5 to see 7.0 to function fully.
guada 2
18th March 2005, 02:51
Sorry, I am going to sleep.
Tomorrow.
acidsex
18th March 2005, 03:27
I just checked their site and I still have the most current version. I did a side by side test in January with Squeeze 4 and Nero AVC and Nero not only won in speed but quality as well.
Sirber
18th March 2005, 04:22
Originally posted by guada 2
Sirber, I think that you have a problem.Yeah, I come to think that too. Should I terminate my faulty existence?
Andrey
18th March 2005, 08:40
>>Sorenson AVC Pro
It was slow, low quality...
It seems that nothing changed from that moment.
bond
18th March 2005, 11:27
Originally posted by guada 2
It requires QuickTime 6.5 to see 7.0 to function fullywhat do you mean with that? :confused:
video
18th March 2005, 12:32
Originally posted by bond
what do you mean with that? :confused:
afaik quicktime 7 is available only in OSX codename 'tiger' beta/technical preview editions today.
bond
18th March 2005, 12:45
Originally posted by video
afaik quicktime 7 is available only in OSX codename 'tiger' beta/technical preview editions today. indeed, but this doesnt tell me what guadas sentence mean!?
SeeMoreDigital
18th March 2005, 15:07
When I tried the last trial version of Sorenson's AVC codec it was nothing like as good as "any" of Nero's releases...
Cheers
Andrey
18th March 2005, 20:46
>>guada 2: It requires QuickTime 6.5 to see 7.0 to function fully
>>bond: what do you mean with that?
Just guess. May that Sorenson AVC Pro has the last version no. 7 ? :scared:
Who cares, anyway... :)
acidsex
18th March 2005, 21:41
Maybe what he is trying to say is that Quicktime 7 will use Sorenson's AVC codec.If so, then Applejust lost the war as the Sorenson code is complete shit.
guada 2
18th March 2005, 22:38
Look at acidsex,
* An extract of Shaktale AVI : 1280*688 / 1.17mo / 5sec 20
* Graphic card 9800 pro, Link DVI/HDMI + HDMI cables, Scaler Vigatec + Barco projo
HDTV test
Nero AVC H264: time: 11sec / Size: 5.04mo / 9.80mbps?
Test 1080 HI
Sorenson AVC Pro: time: 8min10 / Size:5.08mo / 8.00mbps
I have restart the test, and I confirm in HD 720i/p or in 1080i/p Sorensons is the best.
If someone have a test that it proves me the opposite, don't hesitate. Thank you
NOTE: I am sorry for the translation, my English is very bad :( :(
video
19th March 2005, 15:51
guada 2 I'm permanenetly failing encoding my test movie trailer. At 92% progress the app simply carshes.... very bad news...
guada 2
19th March 2005, 18:48
Hello video,
Have you got Windows GUI self patch or the Sorenson Squeeze v4.0 update crack.
Sirber
19th March 2005, 20:03
6) No warez, cracks, serials or illegally obtained copyrighted content! Links to content of a questionable nature, asking for, offering, or asking for help/helping to process such content in any way or form is not tolerated.
video
19th March 2005, 20:51
Originally posted by guada 2
Hello video,
Have you got Windows GUI self patch or the Sorenson Squeeze v4.0 update crack.
I haven't noticed that there are any patches. I've just downoladed the latest trialware from sorenson's site.
slavickas
19th March 2005, 22:19
Originally posted by Sirber
bla bla bla
Sirber, patch!=crack ;) ,wish nero were releasing patches not bulky 50mb in total updates
guada 2
19th March 2005, 22:44
The rules GUADA 2, The rules Please ........
Sorry Sirber, :(
Thanks and to soon :)
Maximillius
19th March 2005, 22:52
Originally posted by guada 2
I have restart the test, and I confirm in HD 720i/p or in 1080i/p Sorensons is the best.
If someone have a test that it proves me the opposite, don't hesitate. Thank you
Could you actually post some screenshots, clips, metrics, or anything to prove this? Just saying that something is better without providing any visual proof but your word doesn't mean much. I've tested the two myself and agree with everyone else that Nero is far superior. You're gonna have to provide something a bit more substantial to back up your claims if you want anyone to come to your side.
SeeMoreDigital
19th March 2005, 23:07
Originally posted by Maximillius
Could you actually post some screenshots, clips, metrics, or anything to prove this? Agreed...
When I last tested Sorenson codec it was nowhere near as good as Recode2...
It could not even generate encodes correctly from an Mpeg2 source!
Cheers
guada 2
20th March 2005, 03:26
Maximillius, you are perfectly right to underline it.
The inconvenience is that I don't know software of MP4 capture.
Bus only VLC is capable to read the Mp4 file of Sorenson. If you have an idea, I would be interested.
Thank you.
video
20th March 2005, 03:34
Oh boy believe me I'm dying for seeing my little 70Mbyte vob thingy transcoded into mp4 with squeeze4. What shall I do? :confused:
Maximillius
20th March 2005, 03:35
Originally posted by guada 2
The inconvenience is that I don't know software of MP4 capture.
Almost any media player that I have used has a capture image feature if that's the problem.
guada 2
20th March 2005, 04:21
I expected an answer but not as fast.
Be more precise.
for my part, I only use VLC, MPC and Bsplayer.
I don't know any others capable to make the capture of Sorenson avc Pro.
If you know a player, say that me and I would be fixed.
Maximillius
20th March 2005, 04:48
Originally posted by guada 2
for my part, I only use VLC, MPC and Bsplayer.
Well if you can play it back in any of these players, they have a save image function.
guada 2
20th March 2005, 05:12
You don't laugh I hope.
I think to have been very clear: "ONLY Video Lan is capable to read this format video".
Even the Mpegable player doesn't arrive .
If you don't have the solution, it is not the pain that I waste my time.
In short, I consider that the topic and enclosed for me.
To soon and thank you for your understanding, SORRY...
Maximillius
20th March 2005, 11:29
Originally posted by guada 2
I think to have been very clear: "ONLY Video Lan is capable to read this format video".
It shouldn't be. Using ffdshow you should be able to play it in any media player. Use something like MPC which has a capture frame function.
Andrey
20th March 2005, 12:55
MPC has capture frame and go to frame functions.
BTW, in seldom situations they are not working with specific decoder, crashing MPC. Solution: do not use any shit that crash MPC ever... :D
>>"ONLY Video Lan is capable to read this format video".
If it is an AVC video in mpeg4 container this is a bullshit. Unless this Sorenson produce non-compliant streams...
EDIT:
BTW, which CPU is needed to play 1080i AVC ? Can it be played realtime now ?
Cheers, SirGrey.
scorpdt
21st March 2005, 09:01
Here is Sorenson AVC Encoded (http://scorpio1.homeip.net:6970/images/S1.mp4) (30 sec clip @ 2.9MB using @baseline profile only) which I did. Have a look if this interest you.
BTW, you can play back on any DShow Player (MPC, BSPlayer) using Nero (Recode) Decoder. Sure you can also play this on Nero Showtime as well. There is somehow some problem with playback on VLC and also OSMO ... it might have something to do with image size or aspect ratio i guess.
Note: If you have ffdshow install as well as Nero Recode ... then you need h264 disable on ffdshow, otherwise you have problem playback on MPC and BSPlayer.
Cheers!
Scorpio
bond
21st March 2005, 12:32
Originally posted by scorpdt
[B]Here is Sorenson AVC Encoded (http://scorpio1.homeip.net:6970/images/S1.mp4) (30 sec clip @ 2.9MB using @baseline profile only) which I did. Have a look if this interest you.hm osmo4 shows the typical "320x240 resolution signalled somewhere in the file" problem which is normally caused by some crappy .mp4 writers not updated to the latest mp4 specs (eg some mpeg-4 cams)
strange but ffdshow also shows a strange resolution before it crashes in graphedit (its the same, no matter if haalis or nero parser is used)
mplayer and vlc, which also use the ffmpeg avc decoder, work fine here
scorpdt
21st March 2005, 14:26
@bond .... pardon my ignorance.
what exactly is "ffmpeg avc decoder" .... where do I get that. The vlc player which I download and install exhibits the same behaviour as that of OSMO.
Thanks!
Scorpio
bond
21st March 2005, 14:35
Originally posted by scorpdt
what exactly is "ffmpeg avc decoder" .... where do I get that. The vlc player which I download and install exhibits the same behaviour as that of OSMO.mplayer, videolan and ffdshow all use the same avc video decoder, the one available from the ffmpeg project. of course they use different .mp4 file parsers, or in the case of ffdshow dont include one
about your problem with videolan and osmo4: can you describe it?
make sure you use the latest source of you players, eg search for videolan nightly builds or check celtic_druids site
scorpdt
21st March 2005, 17:49
Thanks Bond.
To your question:-
For VLC ... it plays back as 4:3 AR. However when I change the setting under preference --> General --> Video --> Source Aspect Ratio to a value of 1. The movie now plays proper.
As for OSMO (v0.2.3), I made a mistake in my description ... it plays back proper, but it crops from the centre and only show a portion of the movie. Here is a sample of the screen shot.
screen shot (http://scorpio1.homeip.net:6970/images/OSMO.jpg). I don't normally use OSMO .... so I have limited knowledge [probably zero] on its working.
Thanks!
Scorpio
Update!!
Had it fixed with OSMO, I had to replace the entry in GPAC.cfg for the following line from
video/mp4="mp4 mpg4" "MPEG-4 Movies" GPAC IsoMedia Reader
to
video/mp4="mp4 mpg4" "H.264 AVC (FFMPEG)" FFMPEG Demuxer
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.