Log in

View Full Version : "Medium" bitrate cqm


*.mp4 guy
24th February 2005, 06:45
Well I made another cqm. Its amazing to me how hard it is to make one that works well on many different types of pictures, as soon as one artifact is nailed down I find that a new one has taken its place:eek: . So This matrice is an attempt to make a compromise between the many different artifacts that plague Xvid encodes.

Hybrid8aq:
8,8,11,13,15,21,23,25
8,9,12,15,21,23,25,31
11,12,15,21,23,25,31,33
13,15,21,23,25,31,33,35
15,21,23,25,31,33,35,45
21,23,25,31,33,35,45,65
23,25,31,33,35,45,65,105
25,31,33,35,45,65,105,185

16,16,17,18,19,24,25,26
16,16,17,19,24,25,26,32
17,17,19,24,25,26,32,34
18,19,24,25,26,32,34,40
19,24,25,26,32,34,40,54
24,25,26,32,34,40,54,68
25,26,32,34,40,54,68,74
26,32,34,40,54,68,74,77

Hybrid8AQ[sharp sources preferably with no oversharpening][medium bitrate][smooth, but hopfully still detailed][will not preserve film grain][not for blurry or low detail sources][most common artifacts are blurring and light ringing, low occurence of blocks]

Also are there any plans for another cqm comparison? There always Helpful in showing which matrices are actually good at what. On that note comments are very very welcome!

Sharktooth
24th February 2005, 15:56
Hosted here: http://www.aziendeassociate.com/cqm/hybrid8aq.xcm

Soulhunter
24th February 2005, 16:28
Originally posted by *.mp4 guy

I have no other way to host it, and its only 128bytes...


Or use RapidShare (http://rapidshare.de/de/webhosting.html) -> My CQM archive... (http://dl03.rapidshare.de/files/694262/63/Custom_Quant_Matrices.zip) ^^


Originally posted by *.mp4 guy

Also are there any plans for another cqm comparison? There always Helpful in showing which matrices are actually good at what...

If I would know a good way to attract some more participants... :\

Seems there is not much public interest for another CQM comparison !?!


Bye

*.mp4 guy
24th February 2005, 22:54
Well I would certanly be interested in another cqm comparison. Imo the cqm used for encoding is one of the most important factors in determining the final look and quality of an encode. Also thanks for the hosting :).

Soulhunter
25th February 2005, 01:40
@ *.mp4 guy

Ok, you convinced me... :D

But this time I use only 5 CQM's or so !!!


@ Sharktooth

Which of your CQM's should I use for the 1st round ???

The Matrix (German/PAL/R2) - The lobby shoot-out (03:08 min.)

Crop(0,78,720,420).LanczosResize(720,288)

Bitrate ~1100kbps


Comp. tests results with XviD v.1.0.3

Defaults / MPEG @ Q2 = 2565kbps

Defaults / H.263 @ Q2 = 2384kbps


Bye

Prettz
25th February 2005, 03:02
At this point people have probably seen enough quant matrix comparisons and unresized screenshots that look pretty much identical. I think the most helpful thing you could do if you made a comparison would be to post avi clips of encoded movies showing scenes of interest, which could then be viewed fullscreen in a media player for a realistic comparison.

The only difference between most of these matrices is how noticeable ringing and swimming-texture artifacts are when watching a video play. Fine detail preservation is in there too, but what's most important is the total impression you get of a given scene when watching the video play.

Hosting video clips for public download is asking a lot, I know, but that's just my 2 cents.

Soulhunter
25th February 2005, 03:28
Originally posted by Prettz

At this point people have probably seen enough quant matrix comparisons and unresized screenshots that look pretty much identical. I think the most helpful thing you could do if you made a comparison would be to post avi clips of encoded movies showing scenes of interest, which could then be viewed fullscreen in a media player for a realistic comparison.

The only difference between most of these matrices is how noticeable ringing and swimming-texture artifacts are when watching a video play. Fine detail preservation is in there too, but what's most important is the total impression you get of a given scene when watching the video play.

Hosting video clips for public download is asking a lot, I know, but that's just my 2 cents.

Erm, seems you missed something... (http://forum.doom9.org/search.php?s=&action=showresults&searchid=1295849&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending) :rolleyes:

I already used avi samples for Round 1 (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=84375) and Round 2 (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=85455) of my 3rd comparison !!!


Bye

Prettz
25th February 2005, 04:56
Originally posted by Soulhunter
Erm, seems you missed something... (http://forum.doom9.org/search.php?s=&action=showresults&searchid=1295849&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending) :rolleyes:

I already used avi samples for Round 1 (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=84375) and Round 2 (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=85455) of my 3rd comparison !!!


Bye
You're right, I totally missed those, sorry. I only occasionally thoroughly read quant matrix comparisons (you have to admit, they do happen often).

Sharktooth
25th February 2005, 13:50
Originally posted by Soulhunter
@ *.mp4 guy

Ok, you convinced me... :D

But this time I use only 5 CQM's or so !!!


@ Sharktooth

Which of your CQM's should I use for the 1st round ???

The Matrix (German/PAL/R2) - The lobby shoot-out (03:08 min.)

Crop(0,78,720,420).LanczosResize(720,288)

Bitrate ~1100kbps


Comp. tests results with XviD v.1.0.3

Defaults / MPEG @ Q2 = 2565kbps

Defaults / H.263 @ Q2 = 2384kbps


Bye
Uhm, i would use V3ULR but since you resized to 720x288 i'm not really sure... but still V3LR needs more bitrate.
The only way is to test ULR with that clip @ 1100kbps and if there are too much Q1s just drop it and switch to V3LR.

Soulhunter
25th February 2005, 18:00
Originally posted by Sharktooth

Uhm, i would use V3ULR but since you resized to 720x288 i'm not really sure... but still V3LR needs more bitrate.
The only way is to test ULR with that clip @ 1100kbps and if there are too much Q1s just drop it and switch to V3LR.

Nah, you wont see Q1's @ 1100kbps...

Even EQM v3 ULR eats 2025kbps @ Q2 !!!


Bye

Didée
25th February 2005, 18:43
/*virgin mode on*/

Please, what is a "Q1"? I'm pretty sure I never have seen such a thing in any encoding I've done ...

/*virgin mode off*/

:D

Soulhunter
25th February 2005, 18:58
Yeah, I have the same antipathy... :D


Bye

Soulhunter
1st March 2005, 12:53
Ok, its up... (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=90785) :)


Bye