Log in

View Full Version : Muxing AVC Raw with more than one audio track


Trinity 2005
31st January 2005, 18:46
Hi, everybody. First of all, special thanks to Bond. He is the first one reply to my thread.:D Yestoday Bond told me I should use muxing tools to add audio tracks after encode the main movie to mp4. Scince my whole plan is to encode the DVD collection with my old IBM laptop and in the future play it back with a brand new Apple, here is my further question.

A. After I read the new container forum in Doom9, I believe by now the muxing tools in open source are not stable to handle the H.264. So if I use the tools like mp4 creator, in the future, will it be problem to play it back with the coming QuickTime 7(with H.264 surport buildin)?

B. It's kind of out of topics. If the new MP4 file is going to play with apple's 30 inch Display, what size should I use to resize the original DVD(Pal):confused:

That's it, please help me out. Thanks million.:D

JoeBG
31st January 2005, 19:40
A) You can mux the raw to mp4 with mp4creator (not wit MP4UI in the moment). And then you can add audio with mp4 box. Mezzanine is writing a gui for mp4box in the moment and mp4ui will be updated soon. In the moment you have tió use commandlines. Any questions to commandlines?

yaz
1st February 2005, 13:35
@joebg
are u sure it's working ? last time i tried this mp4box refused to handle avc/mp4 so i made it in a reverse way; added first the audio to a (fake)asp/mp4 w/mp4box and then changed the video w/mp4ip. hmmm ... should i give a try to the new mp4box ?
the bests
y

bond
1st February 2005, 13:59
before we repeat the whole discussion, everyone look here (http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=89114)

Trinity 2005, you should use search before starting a new thread

moved to container forum

Trinity 2005
1st February 2005, 15:39
Thanks for the e-mail from bond. Anyway, I was just a little bit confused by the standard. After read the link, it's clear that with both mp4creator and graphedit I can do the muxing well. But which one is more standardlized? I mean more stable. Thank you.:p

bond
1st February 2005, 16:37
Originally posted by Trinity 2005
But which one is more standardlized? I mean more stablewell that needs to be tested ;)