tritium
10th January 2005, 13:32
Anyone have an idea on what the output size/quality would be like, if i set a job to encode half of the movie on one CPU, and the other half on the other. Eg.
Say we have a video MyChristmasBreak2004.
Its an hour long for convenience.
I have two copys on disk, one on C:, and the other on D:
I setup a job, and get tell it i only want the first 30 mins encoded(c:\).
I setup a second job, and tell it i want the last 30 mins encoded(d:\).
With a bit of luck, this should allow the box to run at 100% CPU.
At the end, join the two manually, and mux in the audio.
Questions:
Will this work? I cant see a reason why not.
What will the output be like. I would suspect that it would be slightly higher filesize / lower quality, as the codec would not be able to allocate the same number of bpf from a 'half encode' rather than the full lot.
I'm going to have to get down to the basics, and use VDub for this, which i'm not all that used to tbh. Before i start to play with it, can someone lend thoughts to whether they think its worth it?
Thanks.
Say we have a video MyChristmasBreak2004.
Its an hour long for convenience.
I have two copys on disk, one on C:, and the other on D:
I setup a job, and get tell it i only want the first 30 mins encoded(c:\).
I setup a second job, and tell it i want the last 30 mins encoded(d:\).
With a bit of luck, this should allow the box to run at 100% CPU.
At the end, join the two manually, and mux in the audio.
Questions:
Will this work? I cant see a reason why not.
What will the output be like. I would suspect that it would be slightly higher filesize / lower quality, as the codec would not be able to allocate the same number of bpf from a 'half encode' rather than the full lot.
I'm going to have to get down to the basics, and use VDub for this, which i'm not all that used to tbh. Before i start to play with it, can someone lend thoughts to whether they think its worth it?
Thanks.