QXGA Beamer... [Archive]

Soulhunter

4th January 2005, 22:02

Seems I have to rob a bank to get something like this... (http://pro.jvc.com/prof/Attributes/list_price.jsp?tree=&model_id=MDL101275&itempath=&feature_id=00) :scared:

Bye

fccHandler

5th January 2005, 01:52

Good grief! Do banks even keep that much money around??? I think you'd have to overthow a small government to pay for something like this. :eek:

Note that the price doesn't include the lens...

Joe Fenton

5th January 2005, 02:08

Yeah - you'd think for a quarter million dollars, they'd include the lens. :rolleyes: :D

Soulhunter

5th January 2005, 02:09

And make sure you have enough money left for the electricity-bill... :D
Power Consumption: 2800 W

Bye

Atamido

7th January 2005, 09:21

Wow. Sony makes a projector that does 1920x1080p using 3 LCOS for only about $30k. That JVC is 50% more resolution for 8x the price. I think the Sony would be good enough for me. Oh, and the Sony included a lens, although a replacement was still several $k.

SeeMoreDigital

7th January 2005, 19:08

Personally I don't think the spec is all that good.

A "4:3" resolution of 2048x1536 is okay but I would have preferred "16:9" resolutions myself!

And why is an SDI input module an "optional" item. And all the other inputs "analogue"?

Cheers

neo75903

9th January 2005, 03:23

erm dunn0 if anyone interested but Sony's HS51 is also ground breaking specially in terms of contrast.

edit: SeeMoreDigital, can you give a good reason for 16:9?
I have a 16:9 beamer, but a friend of mine who is about to get one just doesnt seem to see the advantages of a 16:9 format.
Maybe you can gimme some more reasons to convince him.