Log in

View Full Version : Nero H264 AVC vs VP6.2.6


Pages : 1 [2]

LordRPI
16th December 2004, 01:30
Originally posted by temporance

Agreed: and with this in mind, who can blame the likes of DXN for bastardizing the levels/profiles. Anyone can define their own levels / profiles - and it's not something that can be protected by patents. The real test of the usefulness of levels/profiles is whether they become widely adopted. It doesn't look like ASP is going to pass this test.


This decision was before my time, although I do understand it's very difficult to successfully get a product out the door on very loosely defined standards. Even as loose as the standard is now for the DivX Certified Profiles (we have no way of ensuring everybody uses similar settings... so lets just think of them as strict guidelines), it's better than what it is at worst case scenario. Shipping products that do the job are important. You're all smart enough to know what that leads to without me having to sound all evil and corporate =]

Originally posted by stephanV
then what do things like ASP really mean to me?

<sarcasm>Application service provider.</sarcasm>

Edit: spelling errors, and there probably are more of them in here...

skal
16th December 2004, 10:20
Originally posted by temporance
e all this to come with AVC. Let's hope the AVC profiles are better mapped to hardware realities. There, nearly back on topic ;)

Actually they look real better fit to their respective target.
Only will the in-loop filtering consumes lotsa silicon, i fear.
And so will MBAFF.
But we sure are lightyears away from mpeg4's profiles mess.

Skal