Log in

View Full Version : replaceing the he-aac or aac with others worth it?


gavo
8th November 2004, 06:49
Is it worth it to put in a mkv of real 10 nero he-aac and not reals. Will it default be picked up by most media players or not?

Sirber
8th November 2004, 13:06
Originally posted by gavo
real 10 nero he-aac:thanks:

gavo
9th November 2004, 05:07
wtf

Sirber
9th November 2004, 13:46
There are no "Real 10 nero he-aac" codecs :rolleyes:

gavo
9th November 2004, 22:51
no but u can place it the audio codec in a mkv. with the real video codec.

Sirber
9th November 2004, 23:47
Yes.

Nero is VBR while RA is CBR. Make your own tests and you will see :)

huang_ch
16th November 2004, 02:45
Siber, Nero HE-AAC is VBR? Real is always CBR?
If so...I think...Nero would obviously be better than Real...Right?

Sirber
16th November 2004, 04:29
In theory. I did not test but I have friends who say so.

Don't try to hide friends!!! :devil: I'm gonna get ya some day!!!

damrod
16th November 2004, 13:14
if you want to mux nero he-acc and rmvb into mkv you must encode separately the streams...else sirber add acces to nero dll in realanime? :p

Sirber
16th November 2004, 18:38
I would have to pay license for it. Forget about it :p

damrod
16th November 2004, 23:57
i was thinking about a checkbox which give user the choice : nero or real he-aac but if user don't have nero installed....the checkbox will be automatically on real he-aac...

(euh je suis pas tres clair non? deux boutons radio, par defaut real est selectionne; si le user coche nero alors on cherche si nero est installe : si pas nero alors warning + on laisse coche real)

bond
17th November 2004, 00:01
Originally posted by Sirber
I would have to pay license for it. Forget about it :pif you spread a tool encoding to mpeg-4 technology (as aac) you also have to pay licenses to the mpeg-4 patent holders, no matter who developed the codec (real or nero)