oo_void
20th October 2004, 18:17
With all the talk of IVTC’ing and deinterlacing going on lately, I figured I add my question into the mix. I’m working on trying to restore a telecined LD capture (live source)… Decomb (Telecide/Decimate) seem to do quite a good job at first glance, but once I start really examining the output, I’m finding quite a few anomalies that are driving me crazy. Most of the problems I’m having surround flashes or explosions in the source, where the whole frame goes a solid or a nearly solid color. Because Telecide can’t “see” the combing at that point, it seems to lose track of the cycle, thus usually resulting in letting combed material pass through for a frame or two when the image regains its detail. I’ve tried adding an additionally layer of Telecide post-processing using TDeint() …
orig = last
Telecide(order = 0, guide = 1, post = 1, vthresh = 40, back = 2, hints = true)
TDeint(order = 0, type = 2, hints = true, clip2 = orig)
Decimate(cycle = 5, mode = 0, quality = 3)
This seems to do the trick in most cases, but there remain a few instances were even this combo results in blending (and even some strange artifacts caused by TDeint()). So, the question is whether or not the above filter chain is sound practice, and whether or not params such as my use of “back = 2” (it seems to help scene changes) might be stepping on other processes TDeint is doing.
------
oo_void
orig = last
Telecide(order = 0, guide = 1, post = 1, vthresh = 40, back = 2, hints = true)
TDeint(order = 0, type = 2, hints = true, clip2 = orig)
Decimate(cycle = 5, mode = 0, quality = 3)
This seems to do the trick in most cases, but there remain a few instances were even this combo results in blending (and even some strange artifacts caused by TDeint()). So, the question is whether or not the above filter chain is sound practice, and whether or not params such as my use of “back = 2” (it seems to help scene changes) might be stepping on other processes TDeint is doing.
------
oo_void