Successfull multiangle and seamless branching discs list

[blueboyec]

Have not had time to try .65 yet but could we use this forum to post all successfull multiangle and seamless branching discs processed.

Thanks for your input in advance.

Blueboyec

[jdobbs]

It would probably me more useful to have a "failed" list. I can think of no reason why it shouldn't work on most. More appropriately I might expect other considerations (like sizing for example) to become the topic. Those are the things that require a large test audience to catch.

[lamster]

But is there any reason to not post such a list?

A "failed" list is good, to know what didn't work (and to convey feedback to you). But if I have a list of 10 movies I'm going to compress that have angles and/or ILVU, I'd probably leave the ones that are known to work for the end, and concentrate on the unknowns, so I could possibly find problems which haven't been seen yet.

It seems to me that's being a better beta tester than just being the 20th person to successfully back up "The Matrix" (e.g.).

Cheers!

[lamster]

Successfully backed up DareDevil, disc 1, NTSC, Region 1, using QuEnc.

(Ran into the problems described elsewhere of the first invocation of QuEnc missing the filename portion of the file specifiers, which causes a "not outputting" error, and of some of the .avs and .flg files going to the root of C: rather than to the D2VAVS directory, but once I corrected for those everything went fine and the angles seem to work.)

[lamster]

Successfully backed this up (NTSC, region 1, QuEnc), and the angles work in my settop player, and also with PowerDVD.

Testing with IfoEdit, only the first angle worked; the Spanish and French scrolling text jumped around from cell to cell and was pretty bad. IfoEdit played the original VOBs OK, so I'm not sure what this indicates. Since it worked in a "real" DVD player (and playing the DVD worked with a software player), I'm going to call it a success.

[dannyv]

Originally posted by jdobbs
It would probably me more useful to have a "failed" list. I can think of no reason why it shouldn't work on most. More appropriately I might expect other considerations (like sizing for example) to become the topic. Those are the things that require a large test audience to catch.

Hi Jdobbs,

Great work on .065 I've had no problems with it.

There already is a failed list http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=84064

[pg55555]

Success with Matrix (R4 NTSC) and Star Wars Episode I The Phantom Menace (R4 NTSC)

[pg55555]

I worked also in There is Something About Mary Special Edition (R4 NTSC), wich have the theatrical release and an extended release with extra fotage. A very intrincated structure with ILVU along all the movie. Originally I have been unable to strip the angles with IFOEdit, so I have used Surink