View Full Version : [Q] Is there any difference in the quality of image of (WMV9VCM).avi and (WMV9).wmv ?
lunaticmoon
24th September 2004, 01:18
I heard that there were the following differences.
1) Treatment at the time of the reproduction at the time of carrying out interlace maintenance.
2) Treatment about an aspect ratio.
Is there any some difference about quality of image ? :confused:
And my eyes do not become reliance... orz
RadicalEd
24th September 2004, 01:29
The VCM doesn't use B-frames, so quality with WME should be a bit better.
Sirber
24th September 2004, 01:31
Why no BF?
bond
24th September 2004, 01:36
Originally posted by Sirber
Why no BF?because m$ knows that its stuff (avi and vfw) cant handle b-frames "by default"
Sirber
24th September 2004, 02:20
Why not "hacking" like every other (avi and vfw) codecs? :D
Teegedeck
24th September 2004, 07:38
:D They don't need to. They, and they alone, decide about the Windows architecture. If they want to drop vfw, they drop vfw. What would Joe Average do if M$ decided not to allow for playback of files that use a 'hacked' avi container in WMP, anymore? Not buy windows? Don't think so...
Sagittaire
24th September 2004, 09:59
in fact WMV9 VCM is the best for quality ...
SeeMoreDigital
24th September 2004, 13:15
I guess in someways it was good of Micro$oft to release WMV9 VCM....
I generated quite a few encodes with it and was rather impressed with the quality of output. But found it to be too darned slow for use as a serious back-up tool.
Cheers
lunaticmoon
26th September 2004, 14:32
Are both reproducible although reproduction of WMV tends to guarantee in a next-generation DVD reproduction machine?
Or do only WMV component which was made from WME ?
You think what ?
SeeMoreDigital
26th September 2004, 14:51
Personally, I don't think WMV represents the "next generation". In my opinion H.264/AVC will will bring this!
Cheers
Valeron
26th September 2004, 15:31
Originally posted by SeeMoreDigital
Personally, I don't think WMV represents the "next generation". In my opinion H.264/AVC will will bring this!
Cheers
If Microsoft give up the patients of WMV9 after it become a smpte standard,that will change everything.
Even that they still keep their implementation's source code as private.
Because I don't think WME/VCM is a good implementation for this new codec.Microsoft haven't think about it seriously.
Much superior implementation will come out then.
BTW,a smpte commite document(not the final standard) which describe the VC-9's bit stream format,syntax and decoding process in all details is available on Internet. I doubt if this is an illegal document,for the company which public it.
Valeron
7th October 2004, 07:52
VCM(AVI)
Force PP4
http://photoimg2.qq.com/cgi-bin/load_pic?verify=7IJhLQCo9wa7IAS1L%2BxZGg%3D%3D.png
Force PP0
http://photoimg1.qq.com/cgi-bin/load_pic?verify=CVbiIj8BqcTeWiFRTBqOAg%3D%3D.png
WME(WMV)
Force PP4
http://photoimg3.qq.com/cgi-bin/load_pic?verify=PyiC9RitjFUmUK7IDvjXRA%3D%3D.png
Force PP0
http://photoimg1.qq.com/cgi-bin/load_pic?verify=iJ9Q77GEY8kjm0IjHuR6Uw%3D%3D.png
B-frame really help produce a sharper image(more details).
Two encoding process use completely the same profile.
700k,2 pass VBR,best quality,key frame distance 2s,25fps.
Valeron
7th October 2004, 08:03
Originally posted by Sagittaire
in fact WMV9 VCM is the best for quality ...
Please reconfirm your conclusion carefully.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.