Log in

View Full Version : Hollywood cracks down on DVD chipmakers


anonimitous
21st September 2004, 21:36
http://news.com.com/Hollywood+cracks+down+on+DVD+chipmakers/2100-1025_3-5321084.html?tag=st.rn

Published: August 23, 2004, 4:32 PM PDT
By John Borland
Staff Writer, CNET News.com


The Motion Picture Association of America said Monday that it has sued two chipmakers for selling DVD chips to companies that are flouting copy-protection rules.

The lawsuit is the second to target DVD hardware makers and is part of a new campaign by the trade association to crack down on the spread of disc players that deviate from a Hollywood-approved system of copy control features.

According to the MPAA, Sigma Designs in Milpitas, Calif., and Taiwan-based MediaTek each have sold DVD-player chips to companies that offer features in their products that aren't allowed under the general DVD technology license. That act violated the license the chipmakers had to sign to build the DVD chips in the first place, the trade association said.

"Responsible corporate citizens honor the contracts they sign," MPAA Chief Technology Counsel Dan Robbins said in a statement. "There is no leniency for irresponsible companies that seek to circumvent the system and operate outside of the law."

The lawsuits come as part of an expanded MPAA enforcement campaign aimed at hardware makers, following some success in blocking the spread of commercial DVD-copying software. The new drive stems in part from the creation of an in-house lab that the MPAA uses to study and disassemble DVD hardware, among other products, to ensure that it complies with Hollywood requirements.

But unlike earlier lawsuits focused on the spread of DVD-copying software, the chip-focused cases rest on the contracts used to control DVD technology itself instead of on copyright law.

DVD-reading technology is controlled by a Hollywood-affiliated technology group called the DVD Copy Control Association, or DVD CCA. Any chipmaker or DVD player that wants the rights to unscramble the digital locks put on commercial DVDs must agree to a specific set of contract terms approved by the big studios.

Those contracts include provisions that bar the creation of DVD-copying devices. They also require DVD makers to ensure that any output plugs--such as those that carry a signal from a DVD player to a television or potentially to a recording device--are protected enough, such that high-quality copies can't be made.

An MPAA spokesman said the group's new lab had found devices with unprotected outputs that included components from Sigma and MediaTek. The lawsuits against both companies are based on breach of the contract with DVD CCA.

A representative for Sigma could not be reached for comment.

Last month, the MPAA won a preliminary injunction against Fremont, Calif.-based ESS Technology, which allegedly sold DVD chips to a company that was making a DVD-copying device.

LordRPI
22nd September 2004, 02:10
Wasn't this discussed elsewhere too? It's dated August, 23rd.

Neo Neko
22nd September 2004, 11:45
Yeah it was discussed a while back. But the MPAA has not been idle. Why just yesterday this (http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/20/2351242&tid=188&tid=123&tid=17&tid=106) popped up. :rolleyes:

anonimitous
22nd September 2004, 13:51
Hey , sorry for repost , i had not seen it posted . Hehe i saw the article when reading the article on /. that Neo posted an thought it was important , since alot of people here use Sigma an MediaTek chiped players on this forum .

OT : Neo Neko , i have never got a chance , but seen your location for a long time , an thought it would be a good time to say "hello" to a fellow KCMO'n . I know it sounds corny , but ive been reading your opinion for a long time an think we share some of the same ideals , an beeing from the same place , i allways thought it would be cool to just say Hi an that you represent us missourians well .

dragongodz
22nd September 2004, 14:20
Neo Neko - thanks for that link. very interesting reading. i would suggest others do toake the time to read it. especially read the page linked to from the "takedown notice to Linux Australia".

no doubt there are those who wont care and still say these types of actions are right and the law or peoples rights be damned. do we need to have someone on deaths row(figuritivly speaking) before these "people"(MPAA,RIAA) are made accountable for THEIR actions ? :angry:

Cyberman
22nd September 2004, 15:16
Originally posted by anonimitous
According to the MPAA, Sigma Designs in Milpitas, Calif., and Taiwan-based MediaTek each have sold DVD-player chips to companies that offer features in their products that aren't allowed under the general DVD technology license. That act violated the license the chipmakers had to sign to build the DVD chips in the first place, the trade association said.

Well, thatīs stupid. Why did they sign the contract but broke it?

Hiro2k
22nd September 2004, 18:43
Greed or Neglegince

Mug Funky
23rd September 2004, 05:15
we're not getting the whole story there - these are "not sufficiently protected outputs". that means analog outputs. when we get to this area, contracts can be interpreted in very iffy ways.

i suspect that these contracts are worded in an open manner to allow this sort of thing to happen.

besides that, isn't the MPAA reverse-engineering mediatek and sigma's technology? isn't that also illegal? remember, the end does not justify the means. a confession extracted under coercion or torture is not a valid confession under any laws i know of.

[edit]

btw, that linux australia thing is very interesting. i hope they win against the evil spammers.

dragongodz
23rd September 2004, 06:17
i suspect what they mean is the dvd players in question have macrovision disabled. atleast thats how i read it.

you are right though, we do not have the whole story. did sigma or mediatek sell the chips knowing they were going in such players or were they told they would be in macrovision enabled players ? if they knowingly sold the chips to go in to the macro disabled players then yes they would have breached the contract. if however they sold them on the basis they were to go in to macro enabled players thats a different story. in that case its the dvd player makers that have done the wrong thing and the MPAA should be going after them and not sigma or mediatek.

so many things unknown about this that no real judgement by anyone here can or should be given.

that linux australia thing is very interesting. i hope they win against the evil spammers.
well possibly more than spamming. really that link deserved its own post. then see what peoples reaction is to more of the MPAA's tactics.

mpucoder
23rd September 2004, 12:34
While I was looking for the connection between the MPAA and DVD-CCA (aren't they supposed to be seperate non-profit organizations?) I came across the DVD-CCA FAQ (http://www.dvdcca.org/faq.html) . A rather amusing (if you know the truth, otherwise dangerous), outdated, and highly inaccurate document.

In any case, why would the MPAA go after violations of another organizations licenses (unless they are one and the same)?