Log in

View Full Version : Check out 100k wmv streaming


lilhobo
7th September 2004, 03:40
is there anything better than this at this low bitrates???


http://war3cin.webhop.info/
http://war3cin.webhop.info/index2.html
http://war3cin.webhop.info/index3.html
http://war3cin.webhop.info/index4.html

Razorblade2000
7th September 2004, 10:03
you could give real media a try

McoreD
7th September 2004, 10:06
Great! :)

Have you also tried Windows Media Video 9 Advanced Profile CBR these bitrates?
You can try this by installing Windows Media Player 10 provided that you have Windows XP.

Cheers,
McoreD


Edit:
Hi Nic, I guess it is because other OSes may need too many dependencies to support the SDK.

Nic
7th September 2004, 10:10
@McoreD:
What is the status of the new Windows Media Formats in concern to supporting Windows operating systems pre-XP? Even the new Windows Media SDK 9.5 Beta won't install on anything before Win XP...Will this change with the final release?

EDIT: It appears the SDK is out of beta, but still XP only (?)

-Nic

Sirber
7th September 2004, 12:27
Originally posted by lilhobo
is there anything better than this at this low bitrates???I'm sure RV10 could do something similar with higher Rez and FPS. I could test if I had the source :(

lilhobo
7th September 2004, 12:29
source is 4 x 400Mb

PS. source was done with FRAPS at 15fps

Shinobu
7th September 2004, 14:59
if i remember the warIII videos are in divx 5.x , you justez have to rename the video file into .avi and you can compresse or test it as an avi ^^.

i think these divx video are not bigger thant 15 or 20 mo (don't have this game anymore) so if i remember correctly, you could upload the original divx vidéo somewhere, we can't test without source.

i also think that real 10 (1-pass CQ + EHQ 100) will do a better works and at 25 fps (15fps is horrible)

++

Sagittaire
7th September 2004, 15:32
i also think that real 10 (1-pass CQ + EHQ 100) will do a better works and at 25 fps (15fps is horrible)

for streaming try RV10 2 pass old RC or RV10 CBR

lilhobo
8th September 2004, 15:18
the source was 15fps.

sorenson squeezed it to 10 fps. so u cant say the quality is bad in relation to what source it had and what limits are restricted it to