len0x
26th July 2004, 22:22
Is it just me or 5.2 is totally buggered with respect to single pass quality-based encoding which is used for comp test?
I started with no options and profiles selected and MPEG matrix. Previously we had to use quant=2 for comp test. So I ran my tests and every time I got more than 100%! It looked like it doubled comparing to 5.1.1. OK, i said lets try quant=1 (may be they changed it). Then I got sort of normal values like in 5.1.1.
Then I switched on adaptive single bframes. And I got less compresibility than without them! (by 3-5%) I couldn't believe my eyes...
Anyway then I decided to switch to H.263 matrix. Comp test percentage dropped dramatically almost by 50%! So I switched back to quant=2 and managed to get values closer to what 5.1.1 was giving with b-frames (and h.263) previously.
So, does anyone else have these issues? (i.e.:
- single bframes producing larger size output
- mpeg and h263 matrixes using completely different quantizer settings )
P.S. problem seems to be only in quality-based single pass encoding as two passes with the same options result in good encodes (no undersize in case of comp test value > 100%)
*Edit* it seems that if H263 is selected everything is as it used to be in 5.1.1, but with MPEG matrix everything goes out of control...
I started with no options and profiles selected and MPEG matrix. Previously we had to use quant=2 for comp test. So I ran my tests and every time I got more than 100%! It looked like it doubled comparing to 5.1.1. OK, i said lets try quant=1 (may be they changed it). Then I got sort of normal values like in 5.1.1.
Then I switched on adaptive single bframes. And I got less compresibility than without them! (by 3-5%) I couldn't believe my eyes...
Anyway then I decided to switch to H.263 matrix. Comp test percentage dropped dramatically almost by 50%! So I switched back to quant=2 and managed to get values closer to what 5.1.1 was giving with b-frames (and h.263) previously.
So, does anyone else have these issues? (i.e.:
- single bframes producing larger size output
- mpeg and h263 matrixes using completely different quantizer settings )
P.S. problem seems to be only in quality-based single pass encoding as two passes with the same options result in good encodes (no undersize in case of comp test value > 100%)
*Edit* it seems that if H263 is selected everything is as it used to be in 5.1.1, but with MPEG matrix everything goes out of control...