WhipHubley
17th July 2004, 17:33
I'm interested on others' opinions upon the issue of CBR versus multi-pass VBR encoding of MPEG4 AVI files into MPEG2 files.
would I be right in saying that as the hard work of compressing VOB's into MPEG4 has already been done (multi-pass VBR, efficient use of bitrate etc.) that there is not much you can do with the source when converting to MPEG2?
that is, when dealing with an already compressed source you need only run a CBR encode, as this will provide the same visual quality as a multi-pass VBR encode?
or can a multi-pass VBR encode still provide a quality improvement over CBR when dealing with MPEG4 to MPEG2?
surely multi-pass VBR only makes a difference when compressing (converting a DVD into an XviD movie) rather than "expanding" (converting an XviD movie into a DVD)?
what are your thoughts on this?
thanks.
would I be right in saying that as the hard work of compressing VOB's into MPEG4 has already been done (multi-pass VBR, efficient use of bitrate etc.) that there is not much you can do with the source when converting to MPEG2?
that is, when dealing with an already compressed source you need only run a CBR encode, as this will provide the same visual quality as a multi-pass VBR encode?
or can a multi-pass VBR encode still provide a quality improvement over CBR when dealing with MPEG4 to MPEG2?
surely multi-pass VBR only makes a difference when compressing (converting a DVD into an XviD movie) rather than "expanding" (converting an XviD movie into a DVD)?
what are your thoughts on this?
thanks.