Log in

View Full Version : JPEG2 compression test...


Soulhunter
29th June 2004, 20:55
1. Photography


Source PNG = 432 KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/1002/PhotoSource.png


JPEG2 @ 100% = 166 KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/2500/JPEG2_100.png


JPEG2 @ 90% = 144 KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/2899/JPEG2_90.png


JPEG2 @ 80% = 124 KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/3390/JPEG2_80.png


JPEG2 @ 70% = 105 KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/8411/JPEG2_70.png


JPEG2 @ 60% = 87,5 KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/6133/JPEG2_60.png


JPEG2 @ 50% = 70,0 KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/4314/JPEG2_50.png

Soulhunter
29th June 2004, 20:56
2. Anime


Source PNG = 382 KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/3894/AnimeSource.png


JPEG2 @ 100% = 88,7 KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/811/JPEG2_101.png


JPEG2 @ 90% = 77,4 KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/1633/JPEG2_91.png


JPEG2 @ 80% = 67,6 KB

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7940/JPEG2_81.png


JPEG2 @ 70% = 59,0 KB

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/8411/JPEG2_70.png


JPEG2 @ 60% = 50,9 KB

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/6133/JPEG2_60.png


JPEG2 @ 50% = 43,4 KB

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/4314/JPEG2_50.png

Soulhunter
29th June 2004, 20:56
3. Windows GUI


Source PNG = 21,8 KB

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/6305/GUISource.png


JPEG2 @ 100% = 100 KB

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/2500/JPEG2_100.png


JPEG2 @ 90% = 89,7 KB

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/2899/JPEG2_90.png


JPEG2 @ 80% = 80,2 KB

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/3390/JPEG2_80.png


JPEG2 @ 70% = 72,1 KB

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/7590/JPEG2_71.png


JPEG2 @ 60% = 64,0 KB

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/924/JPEG2_61.png


JPEG2 @ 50% = 55,7 KB

http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/7926/JPEG2_51.png

Sirber
4th July 2004, 02:55
JPEG2 is way better than JPEG, but it's a pain on the CPU :)

RadicalEd
4th July 2004, 08:18
It's impossible to compare this to the JPEG test... all of the JPEG2000 images were significantly larger than classic JPEG. The quality step is apparently much smaller in JPEG2. It would be better if you could try to get some encodes that are near in size to the respective JPEG images, that way we could truly compare.

Soulhunter
4th July 2004, 17:20
I will do, if I find the time for... ;)


Bye

Soulhunter
5th July 2004, 22:28
Update: JPEG -vs- JPEG2


1. Photography


Source PNG = 432 KB

http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/6343/Source.png


JPEG (4:1:1) @ 100% = 152 KB

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/869/JPEG_100.jpg


JPEG 2 @ 152 KB

http://img28.exs.cx/img28/2142/Source1_JP2_152.png


JPEG (4:1:1) @ 90% = 44,4 KB

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/2386/JPEG_90.jpg


JPEG 2 @ 44,4 KB

http://img28.exs.cx/img28/154/Source1_JP2_44.png


JPEG (4:1:1) @ 50% = 14,4 KB

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/9453/JPEG_50.jpg



JPEG 2 @ 14,4 KB

http://img280.imageshack.us/img280/3151/jpeg21441pc.png

Soulhunter
5th July 2004, 22:31
2. Anime


Source PNG = 382 KB

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/6343/Source.png


JPEG (4:1:1) @ 100% = 111 KB

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/1359/JPEG_101.jpg


JPEG 2 @ 111 KB

http://img314.imageshack.us/img314/3096/jpeg21110sd.png


JPEG (4:1:1) @ 90% = 39,4 KB

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3186/JPEG_91.jpg


JPEG 2 @ 39,4 KB

http://img34.exs.cx/img34/6521/Source2_JP2_39.png


JPEG (4:1:1) @ 50% = 16,3 KB

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/10/JPEG_51.jpg


JPEG 2 @ 16,3 KB

http://img34.exs.cx/img34/8642/Source2_JP2_16.png

Soulhunter
5th July 2004, 22:32
3. Windows GUI


Source PNG = 21,8 KB

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/74/Source1.png


JPEG (4:1:1) @ 100% = 84,6 KB

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3226/JPEG_102.jpg


JPEG 2 @ 84,6 KB

http://img2.exs.cx/img2/8884/Source3_JP2_84.png


JPEG (4:1:1) @ 90% = 36,0 KB

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/8685/JPEG_92.jpg


JPEG 2 @ 36,0 KB

http://img2.exs.cx/img2/838/Source3_JP2_36.png


JPEG (4:1:1) @ 50% = 16,7 KB

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/700/JPEG_52.jpg


JPEG 2 @ 16,7 KB

http://img280.imageshack.us/img280/2815/jpeg21672sd.png

Sirber
5th July 2004, 23:45
hum.... I think I prefer JPEG to JPEG2... :confused:

Soulhunter
6th July 2004, 00:07
Yes, same opinion here !!!

At least if you wanna stay below Q 100% filesize...

Coz a Q 100% JPEG2 looks still better than a Q 100% JPEG !!!

The difference is very small, but filesize also slightly bigger... :rolleyes:


Maybe the codec I've used (InfranView) is simply bad tuned... :confused:

Someone knows if there are different JPEG2 codecs out there ???



Bye

Sharktooth
11th November 2004, 15:15
Corel photo paint 12 has the best jp2k compression i found for pictures but it's the worst for images with big flat areas...

Soulhunter
12th November 2004, 14:45
Hmm, I dont have Corel photo paint 12... :(

Could you maybe generate samples from the source pictures ???


Tia n' Bye

Doom9
12th November 2004, 15:04
well, one thing is for sure: I'll stick to gif/png for my screenshots (that is screenshots from windows programs).

Leiw
14th November 2004, 11:35
png is still the best for me

btw does anyone know if I can use a plugin to make jpeg2 with psp7?

I don't wanna upgrade to psp8 or 9 because it has a lot of features I don't need and it takes way too long to load

Sharktooth
15th November 2004, 19:05
Corel JP2 @ 14K:
http://ebola.gamersrevolt.it/temp/jp2test_corel_14k.png