Log in

View Full Version : What do you think about this: Ultra HDTV (7680*4320)


guada
7th June 2004, 23:00
Small precision: the Source is in french version

http://www.pcinpact.com/actu/news/Apres_HDTV_lUltra_HDTV_7680x4320_pixels.htm

GIR
7th June 2004, 23:37
In English:
After HDTV, the Ultra HDTV (7680x4320 pixels) New technology

Japanese researchers of company NHK currently work on the successor of the current HDTV, baptized UHDTV (U like Ultra).

The UHDTV is able to post not less than 32 million pixels, that is to say a maximum resolution of 7 680 X 4 320 pixels. For Information, a traditional television posts the equivalent of 200 000 pixels (480 horizontal lines) and the HDTV a maximum of 2 million pixels (1 980 X 1 080 pixels). This new format is able to deliver 60 images per seconds. Audio side, the researchers envisage a sound on 22.2 channels, only that.

Let us pass to the impressive figures! To store vidéos numerical UHDTV during 18 minutes, one would need a space of 3,5 téraoctets, or the equivalent of 750 DVD.

This format could be integrated on screens measuring up to 11,4 meters of diagonal (or 450 inches), in movie theaters.

One crowned home cinema... There are time to see it arriving on our premises.

I'll tell you what I think about this, this is what HDTV SHOULD have been, the current HDTV specs is what DVD SHOULD have been :)

guada
8th June 2004, 00:33
Tank you Gir for your translation ;)

Doobie
8th June 2004, 01:00
Ultra-HDTV is a good choice for movie theaters. A real jump in picture quality. People who have seen digital movies don't seem to think the picture quality is much improved over traditional film.

Current digitial movie projecters are only HDTV resolution. I have criticized this for being unambitious and an invitiation to piracy... I mean, if you can watch HDTV at home, you're not going to get better quality at the theater (a bigger screen at the expense of sharpness). The theater industry needs to keep ahead of mainstream consumer video.

Bootsy
8th June 2004, 10:19
Slashdot ran this story a couple of days ago: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/05/0020220&mode=thread&tid=129&tid=188.

It probably will take some time before this hits the consumer market when you look at the specs:
'picture size of 7,680 by 4,320 pixels'; 'UHDV's beefed-up refresh rate of 60 frames per second (twice that of conventional video), projected onto a 450-inch diagonal screen with more than 20 channels of audio'; '22.2 sound: 10 speakers at ear level, 9 above and 3 below, with another 2 for low frequency effects'; AND THE KICKER, 'All those sound channels and all those image pixels add up to a lot of data. In test, an 18-minute UHDV video gobbled up 3.5 terabytes of storage (equivalent to about 750 DVD's). The data was transmitted over 16 channels at a total rate of 24 gigabits per second.'

SeeMoreDigital
8th June 2004, 11:10
Wow 33 million pixels per frame. This is greater than imax film!

Personally I would prefer more research into holographic TV... but I guess this will have to do in the mean time!


Cheers

Soulhunter
8th June 2004, 18:24
Really impressive !!!

Ehm, but consider what kind of HW you would need to play such content... :rolleyes:


Bye

SeeMoreDigital
8th June 2004, 18:26
Originally posted by Soulhunter
Really impressive !!!

Ehm, but what HW would be needed to play such content... :rolleyes:


Bye Not a laptop that is for sure :D


Cheers