ukb007
6th June 2004, 01:43
Hi len0x
The quality generated by your AGK is unbelievable. The strong disincentive to learn the works (which the 'newbie' can do without) is unquestionable. The minimalness of human intervention from ripped .vobs to finished .avi is breadthtaking. The way you have automatized the IVTC-DeInterlace issue is incredible. Your AGK is magnificent, period.
I can't really believe that it is scientifically impossible to provide a choice of AR (4:3 or 16:9) for the finished .avi, maybe as a hidden option in the form of a .fdar file.
If there's a bit of a delay in the program's using the .d2v file right after it is created, then we can modify the figures in Line 11 of the file (after opening it with notepad) which says:
Aspect_Ratio=x:y
where x = 16 or 4
and y = 9 or 3
This can take care of bad authoring in the source .vobs with wrong DAR which the DVD2AVI finds and reports faithfully.
Regards.
The quality generated by your AGK is unbelievable. The strong disincentive to learn the works (which the 'newbie' can do without) is unquestionable. The minimalness of human intervention from ripped .vobs to finished .avi is breadthtaking. The way you have automatized the IVTC-DeInterlace issue is incredible. Your AGK is magnificent, period.
I can't really believe that it is scientifically impossible to provide a choice of AR (4:3 or 16:9) for the finished .avi, maybe as a hidden option in the form of a .fdar file.
If there's a bit of a delay in the program's using the .d2v file right after it is created, then we can modify the figures in Line 11 of the file (after opening it with notepad) which says:
Aspect_Ratio=x:y
where x = 16 or 4
and y = 9 or 3
This can take care of bad authoring in the source .vobs with wrong DAR which the DVD2AVI finds and reports faithfully.
Regards.